Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumJack Smith's DEMAND could be FINAL BLOW to Trump - Meidas Touch
There is a potential new area of inquiry in the Mar-a-Lago documents investigation that is hurdling quickly towards charges. Jack Smith has issued a new subpoena for the surveillance footage showing Walt Nauta and a yet-unidentified Mar-a-Lago employee moving boxes in the wake of Trump receiving the subpoena. Harry explains what hole this information might patch in the investigation. - 06/04/2023.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1793 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (18)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jack Smith's DEMAND could be FINAL BLOW to Trump - Meidas Touch (Original Post)
Rhiannon12866
Jun 2023
OP
Bogus. "final"? No, that is a stupid journalistic over reach. "hurtling" not "hurdling".
Bernardo de La Paz
Jun 2023
#1
Not your fault and at least third (3rd) time Meidas Touch claims "FINAL BLOW"
Bernardo de La Paz
Jun 2023
#3
I do realize that many of their attention-grabbing titles are OTT, but I appreciate the legal analysis
Rhiannon12866
Jun 2023
#4
You provide a useful service. It's Meidas Touch who are "jumping the shark" & growing their empire.n
Bernardo de La Paz
Jun 2023
#5
I don't take the titles seriously, I just know you don't post crap. Thanks for what you do, Rhiannon
marble falls
Jun 2023
#7
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,966 posts)1. Bogus. "final"? No, that is a stupid journalistic over reach. "hurtling" not "hurdling".
Complete with click bait shouting headline.
Not watching (though appreciate the summary, Rhiannon).
Rhiannon12866
(204,818 posts)2. Sorry, I do look for typos, I should have used spell check.
Some summaries have them more often than others - and this is one of them.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,966 posts)3. Not your fault and at least third (3rd) time Meidas Touch claims "FINAL BLOW"
I did a quick search to be sure it was in their description, not your fault. You are not obligated to correct their sloppy journalism or their deceptive fund-raising practices.
Also they said on March 20 that something else was the final blow.
Link to tweet
... and FATAL BLOW ...
https://upload.democraticunderground.com 1017788152
DISGRACED Judge Cannon delivers FATAL BLOW to Trump in New Filing ...
Dec 6, 2022DISGRACED Judge Cannon delivers FATAL BLOW to Trump in New Filing - Meidas Touch. Judge Aileen Cannon has GRANTED the Department of Justice Request to Extend Deadlines now pending before her while the statutory time for the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals Order overruling her assertion of jurisdiction takes effect. Judge Cannon rejected Trump ...
DISGRACED Judge Cannon delivers FATAL BLOW to Trump in New Filing ...
Dec 6, 2022DISGRACED Judge Cannon delivers FATAL BLOW to Trump in New Filing - Meidas Touch. Judge Aileen Cannon has GRANTED the Department of Justice Request to Extend Deadlines now pending before her while the statutory time for the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals Order overruling her assertion of jurisdiction takes effect. Judge Cannon rejected Trump ...
Rhiannon12866
(204,818 posts)4. I do realize that many of their attention-grabbing titles are OTT, but I appreciate the legal analysis
And those are the ones that I post.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,966 posts)5. You provide a useful service. It's Meidas Touch who are "jumping the shark" & growing their empire.n
gab13by13
(21,264 posts)6. To each his/her own.
I post to give my opinion #1, #2 I back it up with a link.
I am not a fan of posting links with no opinion, I rarely click on them, there is nothing to debate.
I do a lot of opinion without a link also.
marble falls
(57,014 posts)7. I don't take the titles seriously, I just know you don't post crap. Thanks for what you do, Rhiannon
... there's been a wave of clickbait titles on OPs on DU and on original posts, too. It's the times. But when I see your OPs I know the titles are the titles of the original material, not your two cent spin.
KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK!!!!
Rhiannon12866
(204,818 posts)9. LOL! Thanks! And you're right...
I generally post important discussions on the legal issues...
republianmushroom
(13,494 posts)8. 28 months and counting