Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

bucolic_frolic

(55,818 posts)
1. Keith, you so need a new video setup
Fri Jul 28, 2023, 05:15 AM
Jul 2023

It's like your camera is high on a shelf and you are sitting in a phone booth.

Oopsie Daisy

(6,670 posts)
3. I agree. He could do better. He needs someone to help him with these tech-y and visual things.
Fri Jul 28, 2023, 09:38 AM
Jul 2023

Oopsie Daisy

(6,670 posts)
4. I expect they'll respond with something that includes the words "right to privacy" or something.
Fri Jul 28, 2023, 09:39 AM
Jul 2023

It will be a weak justification or excuse, whatever it is that they come up with.

Oopsie Daisy

(6,670 posts)
5. AI QUERY: Why would someone want to purposely destroy evidence that proved their innocence?
Fri Jul 28, 2023, 09:43 AM
Jul 2023

ME: Why would someone want to purposely destroy evidence that proved their innocence?

CHATBOT: There could be several reasons why someone might want to destroy evidence that proves their innocence, although it's important to note that such behavior is generally considered irrational and counterproductive. Here are a few possible explanations:

-- Fear or panic: In certain situations, individuals might feel overwhelmed by fear or panic, leading them to make impulsive and irrational decisions. Destroying evidence could be an act of desperation, driven by the belief that removing the evidence will somehow protect them from legal consequences or other negative outcomes. However, this is typically a misguided and ineffective strategy.

-- Lack of trust in the legal system: Some individuals may have a deep-seated mistrust of the legal system, perhaps due to past experiences or a belief that they will not receive a fair trial. In such cases, they might assume that the evidence will be mishandled, tampered with, or ignored, leading them to take matters into their own hands and destroy the evidence themselves.

-- Protection of others: In certain situations, individuals might be motivated to destroy evidence to protect someone else, such as a loved one or a friend. They might believe that by eliminating the evidence, they can shield the other person from legal consequences, even if it means sacrificing their own chances of proving their innocence.

-- Guilty conscience: While it may seem counterintuitive, some individuals may actually be guilty of other offenses related to the case or have personal reasons for not wanting certain information to come to light. In such instances, they might destroy evidence that proves their innocence because it could potentially expose them in other ways.

It's essential to reiterate that these reasons are not justified or advisable. Destroying evidence is illegal and can significantly harm one's credibility and legal standing, potentially leading to severe consequences. It is always recommended to work within the legal system, seek advice from legal professionals, and present evidence supporting one's innocence in a lawful and appropriate manner.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»"THE BOSS WANTED THE SERV...