Eastman's defense in state bar trial
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by JudyM (a host of the Video & Multimedia forum).
Christopher Goffard, Los Angeles Times
... The man Eastman called as his first witness last week, a former Wisconsin Supreme Court justice, has asserted the election was stolen, though his own turmoil-racked inquiry turned up no proof that fraud tilted the election to Joe Biden.
The witness, Michael Gableman, admitted he had no experience with election law when the Republican leader of the Wisconsin Assembly picked him in 2021 to lead a taxpayer-funded probe of the election. Gableman has also admitted that he did not have "any understanding of how elections work" ...
... controversy plagued Gableman's partisan election review from start to finish ... At one point, Gableman refused to answer questions in a Wisconsin circuit court, and the judge held him in contempt for flouting the state's open records law ...
Eastman's lawyer argued to have Gableman admitted as an expert on election law. Roland ruled that he had no such expertise ...
https://thebrunswicknews.com/news/business/after-months-of-testimony-john-eastman-mounts-his-defense-in-california-state-bar-trial/article_5f3acebd-6fb1-553f-96ad-1596af719b52.html
= new reply since forum marked as read
