Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

suninvited

(4,616 posts)
Mon May 21, 2012, 12:36 PM May 2012

I lost my job at the coffee shop this weekend.

A customer came in asking for tea with ice, but then would start complaining when I would add the ice.

I thought maybe I had put in too much ice so I started over and made a fresh cup with less ice.

She asked the manager for a refund after she had her tea, and told him she didn't ask for ice. Turns out she had only wanted the tea cup partially filled with water so she could add ice after it brewed. Geez, why didn't she say so !?!

The manager was really mad about the irate customer and he hates refunding money so he told me to pack my stuff and go home. Forever.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
5. In all seriousness, I agree.
Mon May 21, 2012, 06:32 PM
May 2012

We have a trade association, the SCAA, but we share it with the coffeehouse owners (most of whom started out as baristi themselves) which isn't so bad in the case of the indie coffeehouses, but the three largest companies in the field: Dunkin, Starbucks and Peet's, have been refused membership which I think is a mistake. (There's no reason to think they'd join if allowed to as the SCAA has guidelines for employee welfare that they don't want to meet.) However, their exclusion provides them with a defense against being pressed to at-least meet those SCAA standards.

So yes, I'd like it if those of us in the corporate chains would unionize but I'd strongly prefer if they used the SCAA standards for employee welfare and treatment (which benefit the customer, employee and the coffeehouse) over those of the Starbucks Union (that benefits nobody except the IWW* and a small handful of employees that cannot do the job.) SCAA guidelines would insure reasonable industry-standard pay (which is above the current-pay ceiling for Starbucks baristas) and requirements for training opportunities while allowing shops to get rid of employees that could not meet quality and performance standards sufficient to be certified as a barista.

*-Note that I'm strongly pro-union but the Wobblies have seriously screwed the vast majority of Starbucks partners by prioritizing employee-security (e.g. inability to be fired for incompetence) as a demand over decent benefits and pay, demands for decent equipment, opportunities for improved training and realistic means of advancement out of the shops & into the back-of-house for those of us who want it.

ohiosmith

(24,262 posts)
4. Consider yourself fortunate that she didn't run you down in the parking lot and beat you with
Mon May 21, 2012, 05:27 PM
May 2012

an old Led Zep LP.

jcboon

(296 posts)
7. Customers will try to f___k with you so they don't have to pay.
Tue May 22, 2012, 10:04 AM
May 2012

That's why she wasn't real clear. The manager should know that, he sounds like a jerk.
Lemme call him up and tell him.
I'm sorry you lost your job.

LeftinOH

(5,359 posts)
8. Customers are assholes, mostly.
Tue May 22, 2012, 10:29 AM
May 2012

It's a trial to deal with people who cannot articulate what they want or what they are looking for. Ugh.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»I lost my job at the coff...