Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anyone remember the reporter who described the Hindenburg flame out as it was happening? (Original Post) Baitball Blogger Apr 2020 OP
He was referring to the loss of life before his eyes... hlthe2b Apr 2020 #1
Wouldn't inhumanity say the same thing, only better? Baitball Blogger Apr 2020 #2
The humanity was lost. Not the inhumanity. Had someone purposely blown it up, one might hlthe2b Apr 2020 #3
Only humans can commit inhumanity. Sneederbunk Apr 2020 #4
Coincidentally, mini-unblock recently developed a fascination with that tragedy unblock Apr 2020 #5
Here is the reporter's normal voice - and full report TomVilmer Apr 2020 #6

Baitball Blogger

(46,700 posts)
2. Wouldn't inhumanity say the same thing, only better?
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 08:50 PM
Apr 2020

inhumanity: the quality or state of being cruel or barbarous

hlthe2b

(102,226 posts)
3. The humanity was lost. Not the inhumanity. Had someone purposely blown it up, one might
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 08:52 PM
Apr 2020

exclaim about the 'inhumanity' of the person doing the bombing, but at the time all those watching were thinking about were the many many people on board, given this was such a new technology.

unblock

(52,196 posts)
5. Coincidentally, mini-unblock recently developed a fascination with that tragedy
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 09:04 PM
Apr 2020

And did a lot of research on it.

An interesting thing he found was that the recording of that radio report is usually played back at the wrong speed. I don't remember the details, but they compared the voice on that playback with other recordings from that reports voice when recorded in the studio, and the pitch and speed of talking was consistent with the playback being too fast.

There was some technical reason how this could have happened with the equipment they used to make the field recording also.

Anyway, there's a version online somewhere played back at the "proper" speed and it sounds much more professional, but still powerfully emotional.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Anyone remember the repor...