Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Floyd R. Turbo

(26,546 posts)
Sat Jun 6, 2020, 01:17 PM Jun 2020

A toothpaste factory had a problem.

They sometimes shipped empty boxes without the tube of toothpaste inside. This challenged their perceived quality with the buyers and distributors. Understanding how important the relationship with them was, the CEO of the company assembled all of his top people. They decided to hire an external engineering company to solve their empty boxes problem.

The project followed the usual process: budget and project sponsor allocated, RFP, and third-parties selected. Six months (and $8 million) later they had a fantastic solutution - on time, on budget, and high quality. Everyone in the project was pleased.

They solved the problem by using a high-tech precision scale that would sound a bell and flash lights whenever a toothpaste box weighed less than it should. The line would stop, someone would walk over, remove the defective box, and then press another button to re-start the line. As a result of the new package monitoring process, no empty boxes were being shipped out of the factory.

With no more customer complaints, the CEO felt the $8 million was well spent. At the end of the first month, he reviewed the line statistics report and discovered the number of empty boxes picked up by the scale in the first week was consistent with projections, however, the next three weeks were zero! The estimated rate should have been at least a dozen boxes a day. He had the engineers check the equipment and they verified the report as accurate.

Puzzled, the CEO travelled down to the factory, viewed the part of the line where the precision scale was installed, and observed that just ahead of the new $8 million dollar solution sat a $20 desk fan blowing the empty boxes off the belt and into a bin. He asked the line supervisor what that was about.

"Oh, that," the supervisor replied,"Bert, the kid from maintenance, put it there because he was tired of walking over, removing the box and re-starting the line every time the bloody bell rang.”

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A toothpaste factory had a problem. (Original Post) Floyd R. Turbo Jun 2020 OP
Brilliant Pacifist Patriot Jun 2020 #1
No bonus for the maintenance kid. He had no engineering degree. keithbvadu2 Jun 2020 #2
Typical engineers, all theory and needing more common sense KS Toronado Jun 2020 #3
Actually, most of that is driven by executive process. plimsoll Jun 2020 #7
Nice. nt iluvtennis Jun 2020 #4
There is no degree for common sense. BarbD Jun 2020 #5
Top down solutions, when bottom up would have been cheaper paleotn Jun 2020 #6
The latent Luddite in me appreciated this Brother Buzz Jun 2020 #8
Ha. I was reminded of the money NASA spent developing a pen that worked in Zero G Ron Obvious Jun 2020 #9
I Dig It ProfessorGAC Jun 2020 #10
... Wawannabe Jun 2020 #11
Everybody should read this!! Priceless!!!! nt LAS14 Jun 2020 #12

keithbvadu2

(36,796 posts)
2. No bonus for the maintenance kid. He had no engineering degree.
Sat Jun 6, 2020, 03:21 PM
Jun 2020

No bonus for the maintenance kid.

He had no engineering degree.

plimsoll

(1,668 posts)
7. Actually, most of that is driven by executive process.
Sat Jun 6, 2020, 04:16 PM
Jun 2020

Engineers probably would have done pretty much the same thing. Thats a bean counting solution. They wanted metrics, not a solution.

paleotn

(17,912 posts)
6. Top down solutions, when bottom up would have been cheaper
Sat Jun 6, 2020, 04:01 PM
Jun 2020

and probably more effective. I was taught a long, long time ago, when Japan was kicking our ass on quality (not cost like it is now with China) to talk to, empower and above all listen to the guys in the trenches. They know way more about what's going on tactically than we carpet creatures ever will. That piece of advice has served me well over the years.

 

Ron Obvious

(6,261 posts)
9. Ha. I was reminded of the money NASA spent developing a pen that worked in Zero G
Sat Jun 6, 2020, 04:44 PM
Jun 2020

Millions as I recall. Marketed as the Sensa/Fisher pen. When NASA management inquired how the Russians had solved the writing in Zero G problem, it turned out the Russians used a pencil...

KISS indeed.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»A toothpaste factory had ...