Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Floyd R. Turbo

(26,545 posts)
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 03:27 PM Jun 2022

Happy The Elephant Is Not A Person New York Court Rules

ALBANY, N.Y. – New York's top court on Tuesday rejected an effort to free Happy the elephant from the Bronx Zoo, ruling that she does not meet the definition of “person” who is being illegally confined.

The 5-2 decision by the state Court of Appeals affirms an earlier court decision and means Happy will not be released through a habeas corpus proceeding, a way for people to challenge illegal confinement.

The majority decision written by Chief Judge Janet DiFiore said that “while no one disputes that elephants are intelligent beings deserving of proper care and compassion,” a writ of habeas corpus is intended to protect the liberty of human beings and does not apply to a nonhuman like Happy.

The case had been closely watched by animal rights activists and industries that depend on animals. The zoo and its supporters warned that a win for advocates at the Nonhuman Rights Project could open the door to more legal actions on behalf of animals, including pets and other species in zoos.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2022/06/14/happy-elephant-personhood-new-york-court-ruling/7621138001/

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Happy The Elephant Is Not A Person New York Court Rules (Original Post) Floyd R. Turbo Jun 2022 OP
Does the judge define "human being" in her decision? If she included zygotes that would open in2herbs Jun 2022 #1

in2herbs

(2,944 posts)
1. Does the judge define "human being" in her decision? If she included zygotes that would open
Tue Jun 14, 2022, 03:34 PM
Jun 2022

the door to HC proceedings on behalf of pre-borns.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Happy The Elephant Is Not...