This message was self-deleted by its author

[ohiosmith]

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by (a host of the The DU Lounge forum).

This message was self-deleted by its author (ohiosmith) on Thu Sep 27, 2012, 04:05 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

[Alduin]

1. Not post in his threads?

[HopeHoops]

2. Put pants on.

[mcctatas]

3. remove the period.key from his keyboard?

[CreekDog]

4. I don't know, but I think he likes me

When he replies to me, he shows me a side few others here get to see.

[MiddleFingerMom]

5. Funny... except for this, I haven't replied to any of your comments all year...

.
.
.
... whether they pertained to me or not.
.
.
How could you have made that mistake?
.
.
.
I know!!!
.
.
.
Perhaps you're also posting in these threads as someone else and got the two (or more) usernames confused,
.
.
.
Nah, I don't think that's the case... for a coupla reasons.
.
.
.
#1. It'd be against DU rules.
.
.
.
#2. It'd be pretty cowardly.
.
.
.
#3. Forgetting that would be pretty weird.
.
.
.
#4. Forgetting that would be kinda, if not REALLY dumb.
.
.
.
.
.
Any one of those reasons tells me that it's not the case. Am I right?
.
.
.

.
.
.
You, Creekdog, on the other hand, have dropped in to my threads every once in a while to make a snarky comment.
.
.
.
It's all I ask for. An occasional kick. Not having responded to you means that I've never thanked you for those kicks.
.
.
.
Let me fix that belatedly.
.
.
.
Thank you.
.
.
.

.
.
.

[CreekDog]

9. I'm confusec

I followed your dots but the last ones didn't lead to anything.

That's kinda abstract man.

[MiddleFingerMom]

10. Crickets.

[CreekDog]

11. iCrickets

Sent from my iPhone

[MiddleFingerMom]

8. Crickets.

[Major Nikon]

18. I'm putting you and your sock on ignore

I've seen your side and I didn't care for it anyway, but this pushes it over the edge.

And please don't even try to claim innocence. A poster with 11 posts joins DU and immediately starts to disparage the same people you do, agrees with you, and about 80% of their posts can be found in the same threads you posted in.

As far as sockpuppetry goes, you suck at it. Just sayin'.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1018&pid=199194

Have a nice life playing with your imaginary friends.

Cheers!

[CreekDog]

19. Nope, don't have socks

I hate when DUers are tricked by people pretending to be something they aren't, or pretending to have beliefs they don't...the last thing I would do here is create a sock.

I'm not pretending to be likable or anything but I don't have socks.

[Kali]

21. perhaps not, but you sure do have a knack for posting in the same threads

anybody with the slightest clue can see these dumbass "new" posters that seem to show up the same time as you and attack the same people as you do. perhaps you should let the "people who tell you things" know that you don't appreciate the socks and zombies they are providing for back-up. they are making you look stupid.

[CreekDog]

23. Perhaps not? WTF? I don't have socks, period. Very simple.

whatever your issue with these posters is, take it up with them because they ARE NOT ME.

[hunter]

30. Fucking metasocks...

...it's like you have disciples and you don't even know who the are and they're almost living in your head.

I hate it when that happens.

But what can you do?

[CreekDog]

32. What can I do? Nothing. Other people post and I get blamed.

[pintobean]

34. Jeeze, dude

What's your problem? You're all over DU giving people shit. You get blamed for what you do, and it's really ugly.

[CreekDog]

37. Re-Read my complaint

My complaint was that I was accused of having socks, which I don't.

[pintobean]

38. I can read

and comprehend. From what I've seen, you're not very skilled at the latter.

[CreekDog]

39. I cannot say that I do not disagree with you

[IcyMint]

29. Cool story bro.

Were you a writer for The Weekly World News?

[IcyMint]

45. You're strangely silent.

Do you have the blues or something?

[IcyMint]

6. I had a delightfully snarky reply in mind.

But it's now too late to post it. Look who couldn't help coming back for some reason.

[MiddleFingerMom]

7. You seem to keep putting words in my post. I did not say "GBCW"

.
.
.
If I HAD, boy would I be embarassed, eh? But it's your misinterpretation that might cause some embarrassment.
.
.
.
I said this, "Thank you. I'll be taking a break for awhile."
.
.
.
Not GBCW, but I'll not be posting funny pictures in The Lounge for awhile. A break.
.
.
.
So very, very sorry to disappoint, but I guess haters gonna hate no matter what and no matter how much
they have to distort.
.
.
.

[CreekDog]

12. Well now it seems like you don't want replies

I just can't figure out this game since they switched to amateur refs.

[MiddleFingerMom]

13. On the contrary, didn't I just thank you for your replies? You're getting desperate, eh?

.
.
.
But...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
... crickets.
.
.
.

[IcyMint]

14. Yawn.

You're not making much sense and are boring me.

[MiddleFingerMom]

15. You're tag-teaming it. Weird... very weird.

.
.
.
"You're not making much sense and are boring me."
.
.
.
The first part doesn't surprise me and, as for the second part... good.
.
.
.
I'm done... the two of you really HAVE gotten uncreative and boring.
.
.
.
And the "two of you" against one of me isn't fair at all.
.
.
.
How 'bout if I give you some time to go get some more guys?
.
.
.
Obviously, my work was done here a while ago
.
.
.
.
And you've driven me to this.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

[IcyMint]

16. Your rhetorical skills are astounding.

I'm quite impressed, really.

[sharp_stick]

17. Yours on the other hand.... n/t

[IcyMint]

20. Yes, I know...

Unlike MFM and yourself my rhetoric mightily sucks.

[CreekDog]

27. I don't know that poster

I'm not doing *ANYTHING* with them.

I'm posting to you and that's that.

If you have an issue with the new poster, take it up with them or the admins. It ain't me and I don't know who it is.

So much for making jokes with you...you can snark with others, but if I do it to you, you get bent out of shape about it.

[MiddleFingerMom]

28. Bwahahahaha... "making jokes"... "you can snark wirh others, but if I do it to you (etc.)"

.
.
.
"I'm not doing "*ANYTHING* with them. ".
.
.
Your protestations of "innocence" are overwhelming... and have been for years.
.
.
.

[CreekDog]

31. Well you must be a nice guy, you only falsely accused me of sockpuppetry

.
.
.

[Dr. Strange]

43. MonkeyFunk? Maddy?

'S that you?

[XemaSab]

46. It's like old times here!

[MiddleFingerMom]

44. What I do doesn't usually fit in places like GD or LBN, but I post a fun OP in GD about twice a week

.
.
.
... on average over the last 3 months (I verified this by looking at my history, though I didn't realize
posting there was a requirement for being a "good citizen" -- does that make reluctant-to-post
DUer's BAD citizens, hm?). I suggest if you're going to make these accusations that you start relying
on fact-checking that doesn't resemble the Republican campaign's. When caught at it, it doesn't put
you in a very favorable light, eh? So many of you are so similar in your failings that I think it's VERY
reasonable for people to suspect that there's some sockpuppetry going on (reading comprehension is
also a common trait -- that is NOT an accusation of sockpuppetry on your part).
.
.
.
30 posts a day? What is it with you old Lounge regulars from the bad swarmer days and your
distorted exaggerations (this is even more distorted than the accusation of 20 posts a day from a
day or two ago)? When I DO post, it's usually 6 OP's per day (once, MAYBE twice a week two sets
of 6 -- one in the morning and one in the evening -- even the latter which makes 12, not 30). I also
post replies to other people's OP's (even and especially on days that I don't post) pretty much daily
from 1-to-10 replies a day. Just like the bad old days, you naysayers come in here in force and make
The Lounge suck (oh, I suppose I might be dragged into that when defending myself against your false
accusations. Sorry to the others subjected to this -- but often silence can be mistaken for agreement).
.
I've often asked, if you find my posts "insufferable" (I just LOVED that description from someone
else negative), are you THAT ignorant of the Ignore function? Why would you subject yourself
to them? What kind of person would subject themselves voluntarily to that much irritation?
Depressed because of them? BWAHAHAHA -- physician, it's oh-so-easy to heal thyself and to
shut me up without being SO negative and actively depressing others.
.
There are a lot of supportive people (your "good people, I presume) posting in these threads. There
are also negative and distorting people such as yourself.
.
Guess which ones I "dump all over".
.
.
.
Again, reminiscent of RW cries about "We're intolerant? You're intolerant of our intolerance... so THERE!!!"
.
.
.

[XemaSab]

47. "What I do doesn't usually fit in places like GD or LBN"

What you DO?

What is that, exactly?

Please tell us.

[warrprayer]

36. Welcome back!

You rock!!!

[CreekDog]

42. one DU's less-erudite socks

but it's good you know your limitations.

[ahg]

22. Why did I just waste three minutes reading this thread?

[Dr. Strange]

24. Listen to Nickelback.

Just kidding--no fucking way am I listening to Nickelback.

[ohiosmith]

25. Why do you hate Canada?

[Dr. Strange]

26. Stop that blasphemy right now!

I hate the Nickelback. Canada, on the other hand, is teh awesome:

[whistler162]

35. Samething I would do for a Klondike bar!

[digonswine]

48. Can someone tell me who the complete asshole is?

This is the strangest thing I have read here since 03

[Ptah]

49. I'm using my fire extinguisher exemption,

This OP n not a welcoming opening.

Locking