The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsName a movie you liked but will never watch again.
Perhaps because it is too painful. For example, Pay It Forward.
hlthe2b
(113,966 posts)that I really want to watch them again. Usually, those I do have either incredible acting or gorgeous cinematography, making them worthy of repeated viewing.
I guess you can put Titanic on the list--that for me, once was enough.
OC375
(934 posts)Blackhawk Down
Upthevibe
(10,180 posts)Here's my list of movies that were excellent but too devastating for me to ever watch again:
(In no particular order):
The Deer Hunter
Sophie's Choice
The Pianist
Manchester by the Sea
Dear Zachary
Trainspotting
Requiem for a Dream
The House of Sand and Fog
Grave of the Fireflies
Leaving Las Vegas
yellowdogintexas
(23,694 posts)LiberalLoner
(11,467 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(179,005 posts)It's a wonderful movie, but my father landed in Normandy on day 4 or 5, and I likely wouldn't exist if he had gone ashore earlier. So I just can't.
Dan
(5,179 posts)scared shit out of me.
My sister had the opportunity to see if before older brother. Older brother and his wife went to see it and asked sister to baby sit their baby. She fed the baby green pea soup that evening. Brother and sister-in-law picked up the baby. Two-three hours later, they called sister because baby was puking green stuff, they were terrified. hahahaha
uppityperson
(116,020 posts)Miyazaki
Junipercity
(114 posts).
KatyaR
(3,639 posts)I will someday.
Junipercity
(114 posts)"Grave of the Fireflies"
Everybody should see it once.
Morbius
(997 posts)When I got a DVD player, one of the first DVDs I bought was Ghandi. I still haven't rewatched it. First rate movie, as I recall. Can't bring myself to watch it again.
rsdsharp
(12,002 posts)Yes, I was one of the seven people who owned a laser disc player. We never watched it. I still own it, but not the player.
mucifer
(25,667 posts)I still laughed at the Seinfeld episode about Schindler's list.
?si=fGzzKXEJR1TfNq2aMad_Dem_X
(10,193 posts)Don't know if I ever will, because I know it will upset me greatly.
Buckeye_Democrat
(15,526 posts)I took a first date, and my ONLY date with that particular young lady, to the opening of Schindler's List in 1993.
So my idiotic choice for a first-date movie is an unpleasant memory. That... and I don't care to rewatch an accurate and very long depiction of the HOLOCAUST either!
rsdsharp
(12,002 posts)Nothing says romance like scenes of Russian roulette!
On the other hand, she says the moment she fell in love with me was when I dumped most of a large buttered popcorn in her lap during that movie.
displacedvermoter
(4,501 posts)David Lynch, too unsettling!
WVGal1963
(214 posts)
.but we were talking about this exact topic today at my store.
1) Schindlers List
2) Missing
3) Dances With Wolves
4) The Last Of The Mohicans
LSparkle
(12,182 posts)Great movie deserved all the awards but itll probably take another 5 years before Ill even think about seeing it again.
Archae
(47,245 posts)Great performances, great actors.
Just depressed the hell out of me.
Junipercity
(114 posts)Of screening this film for "clients" within the walls of the original location. 😁
The film was greeted with great enthusiasm! 😊
The days of electroshock were long past by this time, but our charges took delight in identifying each location, and even a doctor or two.
Nearly all of those buildings have since been demolished, but those images will be forever preserved in film.
OSH has a long and interesting history, as does the Kirkbride movement that the original hospital was modeled around.
dwayneb
(1,107 posts)OilemFirchen
(7,288 posts)IYKYK
johnp3907
(4,308 posts)It feels like you're watching a Snuff film.
-misanthroptimist
(1,615 posts)displacedvermoter
(4,501 posts)and inevitably you know each man's fate.
Visited home in Lennox, MA last year where Gould lived. Wealthy people sacrificing their lives and comfort to a higher purpose, what a concept!
Jeebo
(2,560 posts)A 1928 silent film. It's one of the best silent films I've ever seen. The interrogation of Joan of Arc was carefully recorded by scribes, and that written record still exists. It is essentially the script for this film, which is why the film is so good, and so realistic. That this film is so realistic is why I cannot bear to watch it again, because of the burning at the stake scene at the end.
-- Ron
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0019254/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0_tt_5_nm_3_in_0_q_The%2520Passion%2520of%2520Joan
This is the imdb page, but I think you can watch the film itself on YouTube.
KatyaR
(3,639 posts)nt
quaint
(5,080 posts)Mildly entertaining. I'm not a radical feminist, but the ending sucked.
Junipercity
(114 posts)And I thought the ending was hilarious! 😂
Possibly because I was a Harlan Ellison fan for many years. Ellison had a reputation for contentiousness, and it is quite possible the ending was an answer to the anti-male sentiment of some radical feminist at the time.
This possibility makes the ending that much funnier, as it would have been entirely within keeping Ellison didn't always pick sides, but he would pick fights. 😁
He was intensely anti-war.
quaint
(5,080 posts)But dog food?
Okay, I admit it was funny.
marble falls
(71,926 posts)Lochloosa
(16,734 posts)Harker
(17,784 posts)For similar reasons I'll never revisit "Apocalypse Now."
johnp3907
(4,308 posts)Writing this on a phone with a Stalker case. 🤣
Harker
(17,784 posts)Why they did that left me baffled. And disgusted!
debm55
(60,612 posts)marble falls
(71,926 posts)CrispyQ
(40,969 posts)I've never cried like I did with that movie.
Squeaky41
(435 posts)Airplane
Lochloosa
(16,734 posts)Sucks when you know the ending.
Mad_Dem_X
(10,193 posts)Both great movies, IMO, but way too upsetting.
catbyte
(39,152 posts)Great cast but waaaay too depressing.
IcyPeas
(25,475 posts)Paladin
(32,354 posts)I think Stanley Kubrick could have found somebody better than Ryan O'Neal for the lead in "Barry Lyndon." And I never could buy Tom Hulce as Mozart in "Amadeus"---not after seeing him as the goofy frat guy in "Animal House."
Both of those movies were worthy efforts, plenty of good, enjoyable work in each of them. The main-role casting just didn't work for me.
edbermac
(16,449 posts)Diehard Kubrick fan. Best scene was with his dying son retelling a story about the battles he was in. But with that movie, my eyes are usually glued to the films outstanding cinematography.
And Hulce was somewhat jarring in Amadeus though F Murray Abraham was terrific.
Paladin
(32,354 posts)The cinematography in "Barry Lyndon" was extraordinary. As I recall, Kubrick did things with natural lighting that had never been accomplished before.
And F. Murray Abraham was just stunning in "Amadeus." What a great actor.
subterranean
(3,762 posts)Mad_Dem_X
(10,193 posts)Heartbreaking.
boonecreek
(1,509 posts)The ending is just way too sad.
milestogo
(23,082 posts)Great cast, well acted, but devastating.
AllaN01Bear
(29,490 posts)Ocelot II
(130,533 posts)aurora the great
(142 posts)Milos Forman's One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Next
It was incredible and power, moving and heartbreaking
As a woman with a mental illness , Ptsd, it was all I could do to accept the journey of the story, and follow along, the one time. I will never go through it again but it is a Masterpiece. Oh and I could never bring myself to read the novel by Ken Kesey.
jmowreader
(53,194 posts)That's a movie you can only watch once - after the plot twist is revealed the whole movie is screwed after that.