Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This is catnip for a Shakespeare fan like me: (Original Post) Aristus Sep 2013 OP
How interesting! NYC_SKP Sep 2013 #1
I first started getting interested in how the spoken word sounded before the Aristus Sep 2013 #2
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
1. How interesting!
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 01:33 AM
Sep 2013

About the three types of evidence used to recreate OP:

Contemporary writings about the pronunciations, rhymes, etc.; spellings of words in the original texts; and rhymes and puns that don't work in modern English but do in OP.

Two thirds of his sonnets don't rhyme in ME but do in OP.

Aristus

(66,452 posts)
2. I first started getting interested in how the spoken word sounded before the
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 01:37 AM
Sep 2013

advent of sound recording back during the '80's. Edwin Newman had a PBS Program called "The Story Of English". On one of the episodes, Newman and some linguistic scholars were studying the ways in which people wrote English phonetically back before standardized spelling; they spelled the way they heard the words being spoken. It led to some interesting vocal reconstructions of how people spoke English back then.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»This is catnip for a Shak...