The DU Lounge

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts) Tue Dec 13, 2011, 07:36 PM Dec 2011

Do you miss the flames when a thread hit 50 posts?

kind of

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Do you miss the flames when a thread hit 50 posts? (Original Post) Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2011 OP

Yes. Bring back the flames. ohiosmith Dec 2011 #1

higher and higher Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2011 #2

Yes! kentauros Dec 2011 #3

amen, brother! testify! Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2011 #6

We need to know a subject is burning up! Lint Head Dec 2011 #4

really! Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2011 #5

Yes, both the flames and the tombstones petronius Dec 2011 #7

I just love serving pizza especially Tombstone Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2011 #8

ohiosmith

(24,262 posts)

1. Yes. Bring back the flames.

Reply to Tuesday Afternoon (Original post)

Tue Dec 13, 2011, 07:38 PM

Dec 2011

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)

2. higher and higher

Reply to ohiosmith (Reply #1)

Tue Dec 13, 2011, 07:43 PM

Dec 2011

kentauros

(29,414 posts)

3. Yes!

Reply to Tuesday Afternoon (Original post)

Tue Dec 13, 2011, 07:44 PM

Dec 2011

It's an excellent quick indicator of a thread's popularity, or of what's really going on inside

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)

6. amen, brother! testify!

Reply to kentauros (Reply #3)

Tue Dec 13, 2011, 08:24 PM

Dec 2011

Lint Head

(15,064 posts)

4. We need to know a subject is burning up!

Reply to Tuesday Afternoon (Original post)

Tue Dec 13, 2011, 08:21 PM

Dec 2011

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)

5. really!

Reply to Lint Head (Reply #4)

Tue Dec 13, 2011, 08:24 PM

Dec 2011

petronius

(26,597 posts)

7. Yes, both the flames and the tombstones

Reply to Tuesday Afternoon (Original post)

Tue Dec 13, 2011, 08:46 PM

Dec 2011

'Posting privileges revoked' just doesn't give me that childish "Ha Ha! You're dead!" thrill when a troll gets whacked...

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)

8. I just love serving pizza especially Tombstone

Reply to petronius (Reply #7)

Tue Dec 13, 2011, 08:50 PM

Dec 2011

Reply to this discussion