Who's a better live band, the Beatles or the Stones?

[MrScorpio]

4 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
	The Beatles
	2 (50%)
	The Stones
	2 (50%)
	Robb knows Some Girls, Like Eleanor Rigby
	0 (0%)
	0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

[Sweet Freedom]

1. I've seen The Stones

6 times, but The Beatles broke up before my time, so I can't honestly say. Although it seems like you couldn't even hear The Fab Four because of all the screaming girls.

[MrScorpio]

2. Don't tell anyone else, but this is a trick question. All because of the reason you've stated...

Wait.

I wasn't supposed to let the cat out of the bag, was I?

[Lochloosa]

3. Now you tell me

[Brigid]

4. Oh boy.

This debate has been going on for almost 50 years now.

[antiquie]

5. Is it numbers or percentages live?

[The Second Stone]

6. The Stones are an amazing act live

and well worth multiple shows as I have done when they are in town. I really wouldn't want to have not heard the Fabs due to the screaming girls. As far as live shows go, I don't think The Beatles ever put on a live show anything like what the Stones have been doing for 40 plus years. I do prefer The Beatles on record.

[Kaleva]

7. No option for the correct answer which is REO Speedwagon?

[Liberal_from_va34]

8. I love both bands a lot.

But when it comes to live performances, the Stones win by a landslide. Mick Jagger is so awesome.

[mulsh]

9. Obviously the correct answer is Chuck Berry, here's one both bands covered

[sendero]

10. Kind of a silly question...

... since the Beatles quit performing live in 1966 or so and the Stones will probably be performing in their walkers with oxygen tanks.

[kairos12]

12. I haven't been able to see either, but you know, you can't always get what you want so I need some

help.

[CanSocDem]

13. No kidding.

And their fans will be wheezing and thumping their walkers on the floor pretending that they can hear something.....





.

[ailsagirl]

11. The WHO

Of course, they weren't an option.

[raccoon]

14. To have actually seen them live, a person would really have to have some age on them.

Since the Beatles broke up about 1970, wasn't it?

[malthaussen]

15. These guys:

&feature=related

They sound more like the Beatles than the Beatles:

&feature=related

-- Mal

[clarice]

16. IMO The Stones suck live. nt