The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsLooking for a DU critique of this food photo (it's not one of mine)...
The local TV station filmed a commercial at this restaurant earlier in the week. They posted this photo on Facebook to announce it. I replied in the comments "Bad lighting on that one." They immediately deleted the comment. I have a few other observations but would like to hear what you folks think first.
petronius
(26,602 posts)vegetarianism, then I'd say they nailed it...
valerief
(53,235 posts)antiquie
(4,299 posts)Ugh.
malthaussen
(17,187 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,681 posts)into a bucket; harsh lighting; nothing to indicate that it's even food. It looks more like autopsy leftovers. I don't want to eat it. Actually, I don't even want to look at it.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)and I'm not a vegetarian. Maybe the "crowded" bucket is supposed to look generous but if you want to get the gist of portion sizing - lay it out on a plate.
Between the lighting and the closeup it looks pretty yucky...
Miles Archer
(18,837 posts)The careless placement AND that one piece in the lower right corner, hanging out of the bucket, that looks like it has a bite taken out of it. The lighting is the worst, probably due to a hyperactive flash. I am a stickler for natural light. It's how I take all of my food photos.
Between the lighting and the closeup it looks pretty yucky...
The red splotches, for me, were a really disturbing thing to see in that shot, knowing that the person who signed off on this probably said "great shot!" I agree with plating it instead of tossing it in a bucket, even though that's the way customers purchase it.
kentauros
(29,414 posts)of proper lighting, and why a flash just doesn't work for creating appetizing photos. (It's too harsh in both brightness and shadows, changes the color people are expecting to see when they pick it up in either daylight or indoor lighting, the latter of which usually isn't xenon!)
Miles Archer
(18,837 posts)...and probably posted on DU as well. All with 100% natural, available light.
irisblue
(32,968 posts)Miles Archer
(18,837 posts)kentauros
(29,414 posts)Excellently done!
Miles Archer
(18,837 posts)They "plate" food differently here. I did some coaching in California but it's more of a necessity here. I'm going to be doing two shoots at two different places...one Italian, the other a restaurant in a bar with burgers / "comfort food."
I already spoke with the Italian place...in the past, they've put cell phone pics of plates swimming in sauce. I told them "I need to be able to see what is under the sauce." I am supposed to be shooting a meatball sandwich, a Philly cheese steak, and a chicken parmigiana entree. They told me they would put "some" sauce on each with a little cup of sauce on the side.
The bar is going to be doing chicken fried steak and maybe one or two other dishes. The gentleman who will be cooking tomorrow does a pretty impressive job of plating...when you go there and get a burger and fries the plate comes out of the kitchen top-notched, very nicely arranged. But you have to exercise the same cautions as Italian food, because a chicken fried steak swimming in gravy doesn;t look like a chicken friend steak at all...it looks like a plate of gravy.
I'll post the results tomorrow.
CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)What a stark contrast to the revolting photo in your OP.
I've been trying to get better at picture-taking myself lately so I have a new appreciation for the challenges. Really nice, professional-looking work.
Miles Archer
(18,837 posts)Verky kind comments, and I appreciate them.
mackerel
(4,412 posts)Miles Archer
(18,837 posts)kentauros
(29,414 posts)I don't know which would go better with fried food, but would guess something that at least crunches like fried food
Islandurp
(188 posts)Phentex
(16,334 posts)Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)I suspect it was taken with some sort of DSLR, and the on-camera flash was used. The angle used is unflattering to the subject which exacerbates the problem created by the flash.
IcyPeas
(21,859 posts)hunter
(38,311 posts)NV Whino
(20,886 posts)If I were to shoot that, I would, like you, use natural lighting, and spill the bucket onto a plate. I get that they want to show that it comes in a bucket and there's a lot in the bucket, but there are other, more appealing, ways to show that.
Miles Archer
(18,837 posts)As a matter of fact, if they insisted on showing the bucket at all, you could use it like a "horn of plenty." Place it on its side, place the plate directly in front of it, arrange the chicken nicely on the plate. That way they'd have their bucket in the shot AND you'd get a feel for the amount of chicken it contains.
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)sarge43
(28,941 posts)seveneyes
(4,631 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)a rare delicacy.