Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahina

(20,639 posts)
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 04:24 PM Aug 2016

Misread arthuroscopic surgery description from buttonhole sized incision to butthole

Sized incision and had nobody to share the rofl with but you guys.

I should read more carefully.

Of course these days with the Donald only 6 or 7 points behind a competent educated intelligent experienced wahine, there are bigger and smaller...buttonholes out there.

Cheers Loungies!

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Misread arthuroscopic surgery description from buttonhole sized incision to butthole (Original Post) mahina Aug 2016 OP
... eShirl Aug 2016 #1
I did a wha-wha-what doubletake mahina Aug 2016 #2
I saw a fabulous editorial correction like that recently. DFW Aug 2016 #3
Bwahahahaha. He he he, mahina Aug 2016 #5
And that one was for real! DFW Aug 2016 #14
Did you say "butt holes"? clarice Aug 2016 #4
Butthole sized incision, or more properly, butthole-sized incision, mahina Aug 2016 #6
I would prefer neither one thank you. lol nt clarice Aug 2016 #7
Perhaps the soundtrack for your surgery??? True Dough Aug 2016 #8
That's when you need this csziggy Aug 2016 #9
I need that every day. mahina Aug 2016 #10
You mean you went through all those contortions and did the measuring for nothing? pinboy3niner Aug 2016 #11
Best. Response. mahina Aug 2016 #12
Coat button or shirt collar button? Butt hole could literally be more precise. Thor_MN Aug 2016 #13
I don't think that's a very good unit of measure OriginalGeek Aug 2016 #15

DFW

(60,162 posts)
3. I saw a fabulous editorial correction like that recently.
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 06:18 PM
Aug 2016

Some paper was talking about a music group, and had to print a correction because they had reported that one band member had said that another band member was on drugs. What they guy had really said was that the other band member was on drums.

oops

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Misread arthuroscopic sur...