Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Product Placement' in "Back To The Future" (Original Post) trof Dec 2016 OP
Diet Pepsi, Bud Light, Heinz ketchup trof Dec 2016 #1
Popov vodka trof Dec 2016 #2
More products that you'd think, too - and some we never saw csziggy Dec 2016 #3
Very interesting. Thanks. trof Dec 2016 #4
My nomination for movie with the most egregious product placements? bullsnarfle Dec 2016 #5
Wasn't "Total Recall" supposedly the most product-placement-heavy movie ever made? jmowreader Dec 2016 #6
Product placement felt American back then haha paigeatemyshoes Dec 2016 #7

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
3. More products that you'd think, too - and some we never saw
Thu Dec 1, 2016, 08:20 PM
Dec 2016
Uses of product placement

On the DVD commentary to the three films of the trilogy, Robert Zemeckis and Bob Gale commented on the different uses of product placement in the film. The first was that in which an agent for the studio would make a bargain with an advertiser to feature products in return for a fee, without any control by the director. Zemeckis noted that Universal Studios had recently created a product placement department that would contract with different advertisers to put an item in the film. Bob Gale commented later that "The lesson I learned on this and the subsequent sequels is I never do product placement, ever, anymore... I never take money anymore. It's like you've got another creative person." Zemeckis added, "You have another producer." [1].

The product placement department had made a deal with the California Raisin Board, accepting $50,000 to place a reference to raisins in the film. Since raisins do not photograph well, the placement was on a bench upon which Red the Bum was seen sleeping when Marty returned from 1955. "When the California Raisin Board saw it," recounted Gale, "they were livid," and the money was refunded. [2]

Another form of placement, under the control of the producers, relied upon specific brands and logos to make the film more realistic. Zemeckis commented that "In terms of creating the image of the past, one of the ways you create the past is through brand names. We made a conscious effort to find products that had a different logo in the past. It used to be, in [movies of] the 60s or the 70s, a car would pull into a gas station, and there would be no name on the gas station. That's ridiculous. Somebody owns that gas station." [3]

For the first film, businesses whose logos had been different in 1955 than in 1985 were sought out. Although bids were made for Shell Oil and Coca-Cola to be seen in the film, the producers chose Texaco and Pepsi respectively, because their logos had been noticeably different in 1955. Zemeckis comments that "A Coke bottle in the 50s and a Coke bottle in the 80s were the same," [4] Likewise, in painting a picture of what 2015 might be like, the producers sought futuristic products in return for placement. For the third film, which took place in 1885, references to brand names were fewer, although not entirely non-existent.

http://backtothefuture.wikia.com/wiki/Product_placement

bullsnarfle

(254 posts)
5. My nomination for movie with the most egregious product placements?
Fri Dec 2, 2016, 10:22 AM
Dec 2016

Superman II.
Total, stupidly unnecessary product overload. Ack.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»"Product Placement' in "B...