Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

oldcynic

(385 posts)
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 06:49 PM Apr 2017

Remember that short guy down the path that you met just a few years ago...

A primitive type of human, once thought to be up to three million years old, actually lived much more recently, a study suggests.
The remains of 15 partial skeletons belonging to the species Homo naledi were described in 2015.
They were found deep in a cave system in South Africa by a team led by Lee Berger from Wits University.
In an interview, he now says the remains are probably just 200,000 to 300,000 years old.


http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-39710315
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Remember that short guy down the path that you met just a few years ago... (Original Post) oldcynic Apr 2017 OP
One anthropology lecture online called them "two legged wolves," Warpy Apr 2017 #1
if they were "two-legged wolves", what were we? oldcynic Apr 2017 #2
Smarter. Warpy Apr 2017 #3
Smarter? I beg to differ. oldcynic Apr 2017 #4

Warpy

(111,359 posts)
1. One anthropology lecture online called them "two legged wolves,"
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 07:02 PM
Apr 2017

capable hunters who could move swiftly while carrying tools like sticks, rocks, and possibly spears. Their prey included other contemporary hominins and quite possibly each other from time to time. They had no couth but they were built to survive and thrive.

I'm not a bit surprised they werre around longer than earlier thought, especially now that h.Florensis is thought to be closely related to them and not us.

oldcynic

(385 posts)
2. if they were "two-legged wolves", what were we?
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 07:28 PM
Apr 2017

Have they checked modern pygmy DNA against Floresiensis?

Warpy

(111,359 posts)
3. Smarter.
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 07:32 PM
Apr 2017

That seems to have made all the difference in who survived to the present. Yes, Neanderthals were smart. We didn't slaughter them, we absorbed them.

oldcynic

(385 posts)
4. Smarter? I beg to differ.
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 07:41 PM
Apr 2017

Sapiens can throw rocks further and kill more living things. The result is we face nuclear annihilation by two males still measuring their dicks against each other.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Remember that short guy d...