The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsMost Overrated Movie of the 21st Century (So Far)
For me, the answer is beyond easy: Paranormal Activity, or, as I call it, Parannoying INACTIVITY! C'mon, admit it: nothing even APPROACHING "scary" happens till the final 30 seconds. (The Blair Witch Project was even more of a snoozefest, but it was released before 2000.)
What pos film would YOU choose?
Liberal Jesus Freak
(1,476 posts)I've slept through it at least four times. Hubby loves it
NRaleighLiberal
(61,857 posts)unblock
(56,198 posts)And loved it from the first line ("well, I'm basically fucked"
Also, I got to see a premiere before it officially opened because one of our business partners was indirectly involved in financing the movie. That was pretty cool.
It actually very much felt like a high-tech version of cast away, with just enough humor thrown in, but few people seem to agree with me.
irisblue
(37,511 posts)I did like the book & it's ending much bettet then the popcorn flick.
Xolodno
(7,350 posts)Much like some evangelical people I know said "Did you see Mel Gibsons, the Passion???!!!"
Yeah, it was a crummy movie. I liked the book better. The look on their faces.....PRICELESS!!!!!!
irisblue
(37,511 posts)😍
exboyfil
(18,359 posts)I always wonder about my grandma seeing it. She had probably never seen an R rated movie in her life. I never got much feedback from her, but I do know that Passion plays often get pretty bloody.
Persisted
(290 posts)Liberal Jesus Freak
(1,476 posts)And he wants to be your new best friend
unblock
(56,198 posts)Unfortunately that premiere thing might be a one-off....
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)I was in a public place.
(On a table donating plasma actually)
And at that first line I really did laugh and snort a bit.
It was really funny at places. But you could also tell tell the author knew science even if the science was highly improbable...he made it sound....maybe....just a little....possible.
unblock
(56,198 posts)So the parts he cared to make realistic were quite plausible. Then in some places he said to hell with it and went for drama instead.
Like the storm at the beginning that causes the whole mess in the first place, that just doesn't happen on mars. But it's a story, after all. A bit of dramatic license is fine.
Star Trek had some cool science and technology in it, some of which was so realistic it's actually here (communicators = cell phones). Then they had to go and have a transporter and faster than light travel. It's all good.
Doug the Dem
(1,297 posts)unblock
(56,198 posts)With such a thin atmosphere it's essentially impossible for a dust storm to cause anything like that kind of damage and strand an astronaut.
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/the-fact-and-fiction-of-martian-dust-storms
Doug the Dem
(1,297 posts)Also, you should look up the story of Mariner 9. (Yes, I am a space nerd!)
unblock
(56,198 posts)But they peak out around 60 mph and with the force of a atmosphere that's only about 1% of ours iirc.
Nasa has specifically said the opening sequence of the Martian was unrealistic. The author knew this and agreed but went for drama.
ProfessorGAC
(76,702 posts)The winds would to be 1000 mph to begin to do damage like in that movie
Doug the Dem
(1,297 posts)Maybe I was thinking about Neptune. (Sean Spicer provided this excuse.)
Duppers
(28,469 posts)Hubs, a nasa physicist, pointed out all the errors, but enjoyed it nonetheless. We re-watched a few times actually. Matt Damon is a fav of ours.
🚀
Proud liberal 80
(4,392 posts)IrishEyes
(3,275 posts)Avatar was really not that great. I didn't like it.
Disney's Pocahontas toon movie goes to toon movie in space.

Codeine
(25,586 posts)Sheer fucking garbage from start to finish. Noble Savage nonsense.
Docreed2003
(18,714 posts)Unoriginal story...over the top CGI...and it blows my mind that people are drooling at the mouth for a sequel to this!
exboyfil
(18,359 posts)Avatar II,III, and IV.
sweetloukillbot
(12,744 posts)exboyfil
(18,359 posts)I am a big science fiction fan, and for some reason I only recently saw it. It is the ultimate Mighty Whitey film. The human, who has absolutely no experience with a sophisticated culture that has adapted to its environment, is the best at everything. It would have been so much better if he needed to be protected from his environment as he gradually learned to just survive, but he used his knowledge of the humans to aid in the native's conflict (which he did). He should have been like an adviser and backed the play of one of the natives in their fight. Not be the greatest ever seen. Also way too one dimensional with the villain.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Millennium Falcon. Han Solo. Death Star. Same old evil Man in Black.
Shit.
Pay for an original script, please!
Now, "Rogue One" is one of the best 'Star Wars' movies ever! So much more heart!
PoindexterOglethorpe
(28,493 posts)It was incredibly dumb, the fight seen in the forest went on three times as long as needed or as made sense, I could not buy any number of the things you were supposed to just go along with, like the girl who'd worked as a scavenger her whole life and could fly the ship without any training? Or that it would start right up after sitting out there for how many decades?
It was so stupid that I have no intention of watching any of the others.
Same thing happened with episode I. I couldn't believe that a seven year old kid, which is exactly how old that kid looked, could possibly be such a skilled pilot. While I've mercifully forgotten any plot details, I remember leaving the theater knowing I'd totally wasted my time and that there was no point in seeing the next two movies.
exboyfil
(18,359 posts)but it might be, on further reflection, even worse than the 2nd and 3rd prequel movies (which is saying something).
Rogue One was far superior and is the third best Star Wars movie ever made (after Empire and New Hope).
Orrex
(67,111 posts)Pretty much every criticism I've read about it is as cliche and hackneyed as the hackneyed cliches that the critics presume to criticize about it.
It delivered exactly what it promised
bagelsforbreakfast
(1,427 posts)customerserviceguy
(25,406 posts)That kept me awake, waiting for stuff to look like it was going to hit me in the face!
Squinch
(59,522 posts)Doug the Dem
(1,297 posts)I loved that movie!
Squinch
(59,522 posts)dialog served no purpose other than to explain the internal rules of the movie, and the internal rules of the movie changed every time they needed a little action.
At the end, the two people I was with and I were saying, "Oh, jeez. Look. It's another dimension."
I do really adore Joseph Gordon-Levitt, though.
Lunabell
(7,309 posts)A big fucking yawn fest for me.
Baitball Blogger
(52,345 posts)I had to notch down to the level of a prepubescent kid in order to get into it, but, I enjoyed the interplay between characters in the Deadpool.
Iggo
(49,927 posts)Maybe ever.
wyldwolf
(43,891 posts)Orrex
(67,111 posts)Probably its sequel as well, though I haven't yet bothered to endure it.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)It's just toyification gone wild.
Orrex
(67,111 posts)Saw the first one and almost couldn't stand it. Not looking forward to the crew's introduction to the Avengers et al.
IronLionZion
(51,267 posts)For me it was Moonlight. People claimed it was robbed of an Oscar so I decided to check it out. I rented it from Netflix and couldn't make it through half. It just wasn't for me.
I have no interest in watching Lala land or Manchester by the sea either, for different reasons.
mitch96
(15,802 posts)I watched it with anticipation for the good part to start.. waited, waited, waited.... and it was over.
meh..... no big deal.
m
Doug the Dem
(1,297 posts)Perhaps you meant one of the actors in it was robbed?
IronLionZion
(51,267 posts)But I kept hearing that Moonlight got robbed of some award so I decided too see it.
It looks like Mahershalla Ali won best supporting actor too
I don't know. There was some issue and people were upset
TexasBushwhacker
(21,202 posts)There was a mix up with the envelopes. The mistake was quickly corrected, but it was certainly embarrassing.
Doug the Dem
(1,297 posts)I'd completely forgotten about that.
JCMach1
(29,202 posts)Rather than nuanced, I found it full of stereotypes.
Tommy_Carcetti
(44,498 posts)It's not awful, but it sure doesn't deserve all the acclaim it got as supposedly being so groundbreaking. I found it to be mediocre, tedious with bland uninspired characters and a jumbled plot.
Initech
(108,783 posts)Ugh, dear god if I hear "Do you want to build a snowman" one more time I'm going to get out my portable heater!
Persisted
(290 posts)Initech
(108,783 posts)Most overrated best picture winner ever. I also hated "The Revenant".
metroins
(2,550 posts)Neema
(1,181 posts)I'm not sure which I hated more, the movie or the soundtrack. But both together, ugh.
unblock
(56,198 posts)i'll agree it's at least somewhat overrated because by the time i saw it it seemed like i was supposed to think it was the best movie ever, and it clearly wasn't, but i still found it to be a quite good movie.
plus, it seems every time i see dicaprio i have to revise my estimation of his acting ability upward. i really keep wanting to think of him as an overrated heartthrob but then i see him in another movie and damn, he actually can act, unlike most leading hollywood men.
JDC
(11,111 posts)Oneironaut
(6,299 posts)I get the satire. The movie as a whole is garbage. There's an entire pretentious fan base around the movie which pretends that liking this movie is an intelligence test. The movie was honestly not funny and boring. It became a self-parody in a way.
Fury (2014) gets an honorable mention. That movie was just bizarre, in that it didn't have a plot. It consisted of a tank rolling around for 2 hours. All of the interactions (especially the cringey scene where that one soldier went to have sex with that girl) felt forced or off. The ending was just plain bullshit. If you've seen the movie, you know what I'm talking about. I don't get the love for this movie - it was a wannabe "Saving Private Ryan" with no depth and cheesy characters.
Ron Obvious
(6,261 posts)But it looked and felt very rushed and unfinished. It might be one of those rare films that would benefit from a remake, though I suspect no studio would back it the next time around either for fear of offending sponsors.
pansypoo53219
(23,034 posts)idocracy had a message. i wish i could say titanic......same director tho.
cos dem
(943 posts)Now, it seems more like a documentary from the future.
Doodley
(11,912 posts)Orrex
(67,111 posts)I hate that film, and I hate the fact that its name is whispered with snarky reverence every time someone somewhere does something stupid.
The film is only worth watching for as long as it takes to explain the joke, which is maybe 14 seconds, tops.
Mme. Defarge
(9,019 posts)Very pretentious and self-important, imo. And those huge black pickles in the sky at the end were too much.
AgadorSparticus
(7,963 posts)The actress that plays the lead was very blah to me. She didn't do very much for her role.
alarimer
(17,146 posts)Oh my god, it was completely incomprehensible. Maybe it was that I was tired and not as engaged as I could have been. Or that I usually cannot watch anything with my full attention anymore.
Still it was overrated.
AgadorSparticus
(7,963 posts)Ron Obvious
(6,261 posts)But I suspect I wouldn't have enjoyed it in the cinema. The way to watch it is at home, alone in a house that creaks in the wind.
The scares were subtle up until the end. The girl just standing there, staring at her boyfriend in the bed for hours was quite disconcerting I thought.
Doug the Dem
(1,297 posts)My house doesn't creek, but the movie still stank. (Apologies for the late reply.
)
metroins
(2,550 posts)Biggest piece of crap I've ever seen.
Mad max was bad too, but birdman was trash.
roscoeroscoe
(1,825 posts)Interstellar.
Oh man, what a mess. He is what, rooting around in a cornfield and finds an underground NASA launch facility? Where the offices aren't completely fried to a cinder when the craft launches, the last booster, with that huge craft tucked into the nose? Are you kidding me? Off through a wormhole, whatever blah blah yech.
And I love science fiction. The Martian, just needed better music. Fantastic book, (remember it was a first novel) and well done film. Good stuff.
Initech
(108,783 posts)exboyfil
(18,359 posts)Especially some scientists talking about the scientific accuracy of the film. I thought The Martian was a great flick on the other hand.
Oneironaut
(6,299 posts)Even worse, the world agrees to lie that the moon landing was a hoax, but humans have invented the technology to travel into the outer solar system and create worm holes? Yeaaahhhh...
Doug the Dem
(1,297 posts)It's about the ONE film of the 21st century you feel was most overrated.
stopbush
(24,808 posts)red dog 1
(33,063 posts)It won 6 Oscars, including Best Picture & Best Director (Kathryn Bigelow)
But it was a POS, imo, and was EXTREMELY overrated.
Also overrated was Pineapple Express (2008)
Co-produced & co-written by Judd Apatow, one of my favorite writer-producer-directors
who wrote, directed & produced "The 40-Year-Old-Virgin" and earned six Emmy nominations for The Larry Sanders Show...He also co-wrote & co-produced "Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story"
But even Judd Apatow couldn't save "Pineapple Express", although James Franco was very good as pot dealer Saul Silver.
(I don't consider Pineapple Express a POS, because it has some very funny scenes, but it was overrated)
btw, "Walk Hard" starring John C. Reilly, was praised by critics, including Roger Ebert, but only made a little over $20 million, which was less than the $35 million it cost to make.
Pineapple Express, on the other hand, got poor reviews by movie critics, but made over $100 million (so far) while it's budget was only $27 million.....Go figure!
Doug the Dem
(1,297 posts)But I still enjoyed it as a movie.
mitch96
(15,802 posts)Kept wondering, WTF?? I did not care for the movie although I like the actors.. One thing it did do was sparked a 1 hr conversation with my date on WHY we did not like it and how weird and difficult it was to follow.. The after movie conversation was better than the movie!!
YMMV.
m
Initech
(108,783 posts)OK so of all the stories you could pick about Johnny Cash, you pick the one where he was a dick and abused drugs and alcohol and then went to rehab? And then the ending was a total cop out. It just fades to black and there's a screen that says "Johnny Cash and June Carter toured the world until 2002.". That's it??????
BeyondGeography
(41,101 posts)Hopelessly contrived. I hate it when I can see actors acting. The Times rates it the film of the century so far, and I don't care. I had a hard time staying awake; Paul Dano looking like he was trying not to laugh at DDL's accent kept it only barely entertaining.
Initech
(108,783 posts)Otherwise I agree. "DRAIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINAGE ELI!!!!!!!!"
BeyondGeography
(41,101 posts)About an hour in I was thinking, "can somebody please fall down an air shaft again?"
Initech
(108,783 posts)It was the episode where Wendy and Cartman get into a debate on breast cancer, and Wendy wants to fight Cartman and Cartman tries to weasel out of it. And Wendy beats the crap out of Cartman, and Mr. Garrison and Mr. Mackie try to intervene, and Wendy yells "I'm finished!!!!".
NobodyHere
(2,810 posts)BeyondGeography
(41,101 posts)samnsara
(18,767 posts)..blair witch and we laughed the whole time and yelled stuff at 'Heather'
pansypoo53219
(23,034 posts)in a 1/2 filled theater & we kept making comments & made some guys our age behind us laugh.
Initech
(108,783 posts)Upthevibe
(10,180 posts)WhiteTara
(31,260 posts)unblock
(56,198 posts)WhiteTara
(31,260 posts)beveeheart
(1,541 posts)Hated it!
Mike Nelson
(10,943 posts)...AVATAR. Not sure they were overrated, but any recent film with SUPERMAN and/or BATMAN. They need some humor - not all dark stuff. But comic relief doesn't mean all-out comedy, either, witness the Johnny Depp DARK SHADOWS. Put the dark stuff back where it belongs... or just stop torturing us with these revisions.
AgadorSparticus
(7,963 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(21,202 posts)But I didn't like it either.
Persisted
(290 posts)AgadorSparticus
(7,963 posts)Danmel
(5,778 posts)Alternately bored me to tears and gave me motion sickness.
NY husband did enjoy seeing Sandra Bullock in her underwear.
unblock
(56,198 posts)but yeah. pretty lame.
Doug the Dem
(1,297 posts)irisblue
(37,511 posts)Otherwise....ahhhh
OriginalGeek
(12,132 posts)is NOT on this list. Just saw it yesterday and it's the best movie since GotG 1. Probably even better than 1 and most other movies in the last several years at least.
I don't, however, understand all the Birdman hate in this thread. I thought it was great.
I despised Blair Witch so much I wanted my money back and I figured Paranormal Activity would be very similar so I never bothered to see it and don't plan to.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,764 posts)There wasn't any in that movie. Lots of trivial excitement and doom. Nothing interesting. Entirely predictable.
LonePirate
(14,367 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(21,202 posts)applegirl
(3 posts)God it was so boring! I can't believe it got nominated for best movie at the Oscars!
NobodyHere
(2,810 posts)politicat
(9,810 posts)They're different.
Overhyped: Anything associated with Michael Bey or Zach Snyder. They have powerful hype machines behind them, and their multi-hundred million production budgets mean a lot of people around the world get to have a year or two of salary (so yay for that) but their scripts are boring or nonsensical (WTF do cosplaying medieval recreators have to do with giant space robots??!?), the effects are technically fabulous but repetitive, and they can't hire talent. Without the hype machine and the effects, neither would be trusted with a six figure indie budget.
Overrated: The horrors that are Twilight and its filed off the serial numbers copy, 50 Shades. That universe (50 Shades is so clearly a copy that it's not reasonable to call it a separate ficton) is fractally awful. The closer you look, the worse it gets. And yet, for as little critical approval as they got, they got far too much credit. (I also throw any Left Behind attempts and the Atlas Shrugged attempt into this basket.) They're so bad that the Razzies need a new category - the Justified Fahrenheit 451 award. These are an example of the desert that is female-oriented film -- there is so little that even awkward, pointless, overtly abusive attempts have an audience.
LW1977
(1,611 posts)Edit, I thought the question was "underrated movie", that would go to V is For Vendetta..
JDC
(11,111 posts)Pure shit
Awsi Dooger
(14,565 posts)Deserves a vote in every century forever. I don't care when it was made. Hard to believe it was made.
I'll never forgive the so-called friends who took me to see that movie in Las Vegas.
Doug the Dem
(1,297 posts)In fact, the ONLY active director more overrated than Tarantino is David Lynch.
Cha
(319,072 posts)And, I don't care for David Lynch.
Not sure I should even be in this thread.. I only see movies when they get to Netflix. Sorry!
femmocrat
(28,394 posts)I couldn't get past about 10 minutes of it. It won 4 Oscars!
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2562232/