Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 02:33 PM Jun 2012

Greek election thread.

I was talking about it with my partner at breakfast this morning and still can't make up my mind on the best outcome. I want to root for KKE for sheer bravado and Red solidarity, but all month I haven't been able to figure out their game plan quite frankly.

With Greece 80% for staying in the EU, I don't think the KKE anti-EU policy is really going to change things much as far as shifting people to some revolutionary socialist stance. Things could change swiftly, but I'm not seeing the roadmap.

Syriza might not be perfect but they have some plans to help people out, and (perhaps) put the workers on a better footing. What do you all think?

34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Greek election thread. (Original Post) Starry Messenger Jun 2012 OP
considering that it's impossible to borrow your way out of debt BOG PERSON Jun 2012 #1
I have a hard time thinking outside the two-party system. Starry Messenger Jun 2012 #3
all i'm saying is, in my humble opinion, BOG PERSON Jun 2012 #5
Gotcha. Starry Messenger Jun 2012 #6
nazis got 7% of the vote? BOG PERSON Jun 2012 #7
I wonder how high they'd get if we had a Nazi party here? Starry Messenger Jun 2012 #8
Isn't that less than they got in the May elections? socialist_n_TN Jun 2012 #10
i thought they got 4% in the may elections BOG PERSON Jun 2012 #11
Yeah, that's MUCH less for the KKE than they got a month ago......... socialist_n_TN Jun 2012 #12
what happens if they call a general strike BOG PERSON Jun 2012 #16
Agreed. It might not be time for the indefinite general strike....... socialist_n_TN Jun 2012 #22
i bet a lot of communist parties get stuck in that middle ground BOG PERSON Jun 2012 #28
From the League on Greece........... socialist_n_TN Jun 2012 #33
I wonder about that too. Starry Messenger Jun 2012 #14
I'm not sure either. white_wolf Jun 2012 #2
You'd think the Greeks would have enough evidence of the limitations by now Starry Messenger Jun 2012 #4
I like BOG's perspective on this.......... socialist_n_TN Jun 2012 #9
Oh, that is an interesting development. Starry Messenger Jun 2012 #13
If Greece goes does have a revolution, I could see some of the leftist Latin American states... white_wolf Jun 2012 #15
Exactly. That's a hell of a commute. Starry Messenger Jun 2012 #18
Sadly I'd be surprised if this doesn't end up in revolution TBF Jun 2012 #17
Well, the way things are going, all the other parties are going to be pretty discredited. Starry Messenger Jun 2012 #19
I think about it the opposite way - TBF Jun 2012 #20
Same here. Starry Messenger Jun 2012 #21
I don't think the capitalists are ready to throw in with the fascists........... socialist_n_TN Jun 2012 #23
Aren't the fascists normally the last resort for the capitalists? white_wolf Jun 2012 #24
Makes sense - and sadly I think they are close to that point. TBF Jun 2012 #25
That is a topic I would like to know more about too. Starry Messenger Jun 2012 #26
Well if you haven't checked it out yet, I think the reading list has something by Trotsky on Facism. white_wolf Jun 2012 #27
Right, the class basis of the petty boug. makes them reactionary. Starry Messenger Jun 2012 #29
fwiw BOG PERSON Jun 2012 #30
That seems fairy accurate. Though it does raise a question I've been wondering about... white_wolf Jun 2012 #31
i am inclined to agree w/ you. if they didn't self-identify as fascist BOG PERSON Jun 2012 #32
That's the way I've always read it too............. socialist_n_TN Jun 2012 #34

BOG PERSON

(2,916 posts)
1. considering that it's impossible to borrow your way out of debt
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 02:59 PM
Jun 2012

a greek default is inevitable. this 80% of the greek public is like wile e. coyote after running off the edge of a cliff and being afraid to look down. it is only a matter of time before they are compelled to leave the eurozone. whichever party/movement realizes this and is prepared for this - is prepared for the worst case scenario - and doesn't pander to the public will probably fare badly in the elections, but its fortunes will also improve in the aftermath.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
3. I have a hard time thinking outside the two-party system.
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 03:52 PM
Jun 2012

It must be interesting to operate in way that gives you expanded flexibility.

I know that the default is inevitable, I'm torn on what constitutes best-prepared for worst case scenario I guess.

BOG PERSON

(2,916 posts)
5. all i'm saying is, in my humble opinion,
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 04:17 PM
Jun 2012

in order to enjoy success as greek political party, at this particular juncture, your mouth is writing checks your ass can't cash, and you will discredit yourself at the same pace of events. this goes whether you're New Democracy or SYRIZA. so the best strategy, if you're serious about seizing power in the long run, is to not sweat over getting a bigger share in parliament right now. imho.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
8. I wonder how high they'd get if we had a Nazi party here?
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 06:21 PM
Jun 2012

I used to wish we had a multi-party parliamentary system, but I'm beginning to see some downsides.

BOG PERSON

(2,916 posts)
11. i thought they got 4% in the may elections
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 07:20 PM
Jun 2012

but wikipedia tells me i'm wrong.

all i can say is it's disappointing the fascists did better electorally than the communists (4%).

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
12. Yeah, that's MUCH less for the KKE than they got a month ago.........
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 07:41 PM
Jun 2012

It actually ties in to what I said in another post about the KKE a few weeks ago though. They are LOSING support (probably to Syriza) because they won't take a stand on revolution or coalition. They have to shit or get off the pot about what they want to do. Either call for a indefinte general strike and an overthrow of the capitalist system or join in a coalition with Syriza and other left parties (excluding the bankrupt PASOK of course) to govern.

BOG PERSON

(2,916 posts)
16. what happens if they call a general strike
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 08:18 PM
Jun 2012

and nobody listens except their affiliated trade unions and front orgs? we know that at least 80% of the country obv. has no interest in carrying out communist revolution. if the objective conditions are absent (as they apparently are), the communists will be left standing there, exposed, looking like jerks.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
22. Agreed. It might not be time for the indefinite general strike.......
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 10:40 PM
Jun 2012

In which case they need to seriously consider forming an anti-austerity coalition with Syriza and other left groupings.

My complaint with KKE is not that they're not going whole hog into revolution, it's that they're stuck in this middle ground between revolution and electoral politics, not jumping one way or another. It makes them look indecisive to the people, which is why they've lost voter share. IMO of course.

BOG PERSON

(2,916 posts)
28. i bet a lot of communist parties get stuck in that middle ground
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 05:39 PM
Jun 2012

when the objective conditions refuse to emerge, and things are sort of stuck in a holding pattern.

what do you do when the bourgeoisie has basically foreclosed history, sealed off the future, mired the world in an eternal present? i doubt there is any party theoretically advanced enough to know what to do in such circumstances.

edit. besides compromising the kke's political independence/initiative, i think forming a coalition w/ the pro-eu zombie social democrats (syriza) would make them look a tad desperate and unprincipled

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
33. From the League on Greece...........
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 09:35 AM
Jun 2012
http://www.workerspower.net/euro-blackmail-pulls-off-narrow-victory-for-the-greek-right-but-it-can-be-overthrown-by-mass-workers-action

It's not that Syriza is revolutionary, it's that Syriza has the POTENTIAL to be revolutionary AND has the largest support base on the left in Greece. KKE, Antarzyia and even the left of PASOK hold the anti-austerity majority along with Syriza. A coalition against austerity could push Greece into socialist revolution.

Left parties are influenced by parties FARTHER to the left than they are. If KKE IS farther to the left than Syriza, a united front with Syriza could hold Syriza accountable. And it could also help the revolutionary parts of Syrizia to set up worker's councils, factory and workplace occupations and the restarting of closed factories and workplaces under worker's control and the arming of worker's militias. IOW, it could further the revolutionary agenda by following the fundamental Bolshevik model for setting up a dual power dynamic. This dual power setup is the next step in revolutionary politics. We would then see who the majority of the people of Greece followed. Would they follow the cobbled together government of austerity (cobbled together with the assistance of 50 extra parliamentary seats because of election rules) or the worker's councils?

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
14. I wonder about that too.
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 08:14 PM
Jun 2012

From what I've read from KKE they have a stance about not campaigning very hard because they don't want to be co-opted by the system. But if they are in the government, they are already participating. This aspect puzzles me very much. But I can't pretend to know much about conditions there the way they do. But I'd think you'd want to beat the fucking Nazis if just for not letting them win shit.

white_wolf

(6,238 posts)
2. I'm not sure either.
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 03:39 PM
Jun 2012

I think Syirza would make some great reforms, but I don't think they would be willing to go far enough. Though, that could have it's own use in showing the limitations of reforms under capitalism. Honestly, I really don't know which I think would be best.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
4. You'd think the Greeks would have enough evidence of the limitations by now
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 03:57 PM
Jun 2012

But it is so hard to gauge these things.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
9. I like BOG's perspective on this..........
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 07:04 PM
Jun 2012

Because the people (both in Wisconsin and in Greece) still have faith in bourgeois "democracy", it doesn't matter particularly who wins this round. Whoever wins they'll fail because they will still be trying to fit the Greek people into the shoehorn of the Merkel austerity policy. And the only thing that austerity will bring is more misery for the people. That's not good of course, but it probably IS the only way to get the masses of the people over the idea that anything will change within the context of electoral politics.

Now, the more revolutionary parties (Syriza, KKE, Antasya [sp?] and yes, Golden Dawn) can battle it out for the hearts and minds of the anti-austerians in OPPOSITION to the austerity parties. IOW, this isn't over by a long shot.

BTW, I saw in Late Breaking News that PASOK is now saying that they won't coalesce with ND without Syriza. THAT'S an interesting development in and of itself. Now it could be (and probably is) just a ploy to gain more powerful posts in the coalition government, BUT even so, it DOES prove to me what kind of influence a farther left party will have on a centrist left one. It pulls the debate to the left when the centrist left has to account for their left flank and not just triangulate and constantly move right.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
13. Oh, that is an interesting development.
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 08:09 PM
Jun 2012

Watching this all unfold is incredible. I've been biting my nails all month. This will be a hard slog for Greece. We were also talking at breakfast about what happens if there is a revolution--what happens next? Greece is out there surrounded by unsympathetic forces. How will the rest of the Eurozone react to Greece withdrawing when that happens no matter what else happens in the country politically?

white_wolf

(6,238 posts)
15. If Greece goes does have a revolution, I could see some of the leftist Latin American states...
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 08:15 PM
Jun 2012

supporting them, but it would be nice to have allies in Europe.

TBF

(32,088 posts)
17. Sadly I'd be surprised if this doesn't end up in revolution
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 08:21 PM
Jun 2012

and I believe KKE believes the same and that is why they are holding back. They know this is just starting and this election doesn't mean crap for ordinary people in Greece (and they couldn't really care less about the fuckheads worldwide worrying about their portfolios - which is kind where I have to agree with them).

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
19. Well, the way things are going, all the other parties are going to be pretty discredited.
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 08:43 PM
Jun 2012

Everything I've read makes their campaigns look like a three-ring circus. I just worry about the strength of people to resist in the face of further austerity. There can be a tipping point where the fighting forces become to weak to put up a proper battle. Unemployment is second only to Spain and news reports talk of soup kitchens and dumpster diving. You have to have something you want to save in order to fight for it, you know? But things could also shift very quickly.

TBF

(32,088 posts)
20. I think about it the opposite way -
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 09:50 PM
Jun 2012

when there is nothing left to hold on to that is when you fight. You have nothing to lose.

The fascist element really worries me - both there and here.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
21. Same here.
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 09:53 PM
Jun 2012

Especially with the police forces aligning themselves with the fascists. That could go all kinds of bad.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
23. I don't think the capitalists are ready to throw in with the fascists...........
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 10:47 PM
Jun 2012

Yet anyway. I think it's more likely that there'll be a military coup before the fascists take control. I believe they actually even LOST voter share since May, so they're still not in a position to gain the attention and support of the capitalists.

However, fascists are ALWAYS worth worrying about. The party of the anti-christ if there ever was one.

white_wolf

(6,238 posts)
24. Aren't the fascists normally the last resort for the capitalists?
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 11:28 PM
Jun 2012

From what I've read from some people, which could be totally wrong, is that fascism actually transfers power from the larger capitalists to the smaller capitalists and that is why it is a last resort for the big capitalists, because they have to give up some of their power to maintain it all.

TBF

(32,088 posts)
25. Makes sense - and sadly I think they are close to that point.
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 09:16 AM
Jun 2012

Definitely closer in Greece than here as well.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
26. That is a topic I would like to know more about too.
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 04:33 PM
Jun 2012

I've read things about fascism, but mostly on the political repercussions and oppression that takes place once it is fait accompli. The objective conditions and pre-fascist economic developments that lead to the rise of fascism like this are less developed, or I'm not looking in the right place.

white_wolf

(6,238 posts)
27. Well if you haven't checked it out yet, I think the reading list has something by Trotsky on Facism.
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 05:11 PM
Jun 2012

"What it is and how to fight it" I think is the title. I'm sure other Marxist writers have written on it as well, but that's the one that comes to mind. Here is a quote from it on what classes actually make up the base of fascism:

"The fascist movement in Italy was a spontaneous movement of large masses, with new leaders from the rank and file. It is a plebian movement in origin, directed and financed by big capitalist powers. It issued forth from the petty bourgeoisie, the slum proletariat, and even to a certain extent from the proletarian masses; Mussolini, a former socialist, is a "self-made" man arising from this movement.

Primo de Rivera was an aristocrat. He occupied a high military and bureaucratic post and was chief governor of Catalonia. he accomplished his overthrow with the aid of state and military forces. The dictatorships of Spain and Italy are two totally different forms of dictatorship. It is necessary to distinguish between them. Mussolini had difficulty in reconciling many old military institutions with the fascist militia. This problem did not exist for Primo de Rivera.

The movement in Germany is analogous mostly to the Italian. It is a mass movement, with its leaders employing a great deal of socialist demagogy. This is necessary for the creation of the mass movement.

The genuine basis (for fascism) is the petty bourgeoisie. In italy, it has a very large base -- the petty bourgeoisie of the towns and cities, and the peasantry. In Germany, likewise, there is a large base for fascism..."

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
29. Right, the class basis of the petty boug. makes them reactionary.
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 05:47 PM
Jun 2012

There are some articles by R. Palme Dutt that talk about the economic conditions present before the rise of fascism too. There is a book he wrote also Fascism and Social Revolution, but I haven't had a chance to look through it yet. Here's an excerpt from a counter-review of his book:

http://www.marxists.org/archive/dutt/articles/1935/question_of_fascism.htm

The Question of Fascism and Capitalist Decay



Both tendencies can be traced in particular phases and situation; but the tendencies to decay, the retrograde tendencies continually grow stronger than before, and the tendencies to advance grow weaker than before. (“The monopolist form of capital increasingly develops the elements of parasitical degeneration, decay and decline of capitalism”—C. I. Program.)[1] And fascism is precisely a sharp and intensified expression of this process, and a direct factor in carrying it forward.

In order to see more clearly the character and significance of this process, compare the elements of “decay” noted by Lenin twenty years ago, on the basis of the facts of imperialism before the World War, and the enormous further development of these elements of decay today. Lenin noted as particular evidence of decay:

1. Parasitism and the growth of the rentier and “rentier-State”;

2. The beginning of “the economic possibility of slowing down technical progress”, as instanced in trusts buying up inventions in order to suppress them.

Today after twenty years we are able to note as further features carrying this process forward:

1. Large-scale state-organized destruction of the productive forces and restriction of production;

2. Increased resistance to technical development and non-utilization of inventions, except in the military sphere, developing even into a widespread ideological hostility to inventions beginning to find expression in governmental, scientific, business and economic circles;

3. Development of the anti-scientific and anti-cultural campaign, cutting down of education, burning of books—also a form of destruction of the productive forces;

4. Chronic large-scale mass unemployment of a type previously unknown—again a deterioration and destruction of the productive forces;

5. Devotion of an increasing proportion of the productive forces to non-productive purposes connected with war preparation.

All these phenomena of present day capitalism, which receive their sharpest expression in fascism, are of the greatest significance for the process of increasing decay that is taking place.

Against this picture of present day capitalism in increasing decay, with fascism as at once an expression of this process and an accelerating factor, {...}







BOG PERSON

(2,916 posts)
30. fwiw
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 07:28 PM
Jun 2012

frantz fanon defined fascism as when europeans apply colonial procedures on fellow europeans, instead of other nations.

white_wolf

(6,238 posts)
31. That seems fairy accurate. Though it does raise a question I've been wondering about...
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 07:54 PM
Jun 2012

Was Imperial Japan a Fascist state at the time? I don't think so, but I've heard some people argue they were.

BOG PERSON

(2,916 posts)
32. i am inclined to agree w/ you. if they didn't self-identify as fascist
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 08:20 PM
Jun 2012

then its probably better to leave them out, since being fascist wasn't anything to be ashamed of back then.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
34. That's the way I've always read it too.............
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 09:49 AM
Jun 2012

Which is why I said in the above post that they're not ready to throw in with the fascists yet. Make no mistake though, they'll support the fascists before they'll allow a worker's democracy to develop.

I'm still thinking that KKE needs to join in with the more revolutionary parts of Syriza in a united front (NOT a popular front- KKE would still have the responsibility to criticize the bourgeois elements of Syriza including the leadership if it was warrented) in order to assist in the setting up of an anti-austerity dual power setup of workplace and neighborhood councils and worker's militias for self defense AGAINST the fascists (and any other groups that needed to be defended against), and workplace occupations and siezures of closed factories, foreclosed farms, and stores to be run BY the worker's councils.

Without the USSR in existance to back them up, KKE has to remember fundamental Bolshevism.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Socialist Progressives»Greek election thread.