Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

underpants

(195,176 posts)
1. I've seen something like this where he equates Liverpool to Norfolk Va
Sun Jan 18, 2026, 06:33 PM
10 hrs ago

Watching football with the family so I can’t listen to it.

Norfolk is a tough town. I spent a lot of time there but in college (ODU) type places. Hey

The Gallaghers (Oasis) were of the same minds talking about “f’ing stooodents”.
Bowie said that University liberal arts programs were most used in creating guitarists (Keef, Beck, Clapton, Woods, etc)

marble falls

(71,213 posts)
3. I always felt the Beatles were working class and the Stones were uppermiddle class. I felt like I was the only one ...
Sun Jan 18, 2026, 07:21 PM
10 hrs ago

... who thought this.

marble falls

(71,213 posts)
5. What part of his argument do you dispute? That the Beatles came up lower class and the Rolling Stones ...
Sun Jan 18, 2026, 10:50 PM
6 hrs ago

... had posher beginnings?

LoisB

(12,429 posts)
6. None of his argument. I object to the heading that reads "the Beatles are better than the
Mon Jan 19, 2026, 02:34 AM
2 hrs ago

Stones". I did not hear him say that in the video. There is no way the Beatles were "better" than the Stones; different but certainly not better - in my humble opinion.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Music Appreciation»The Beatles are better th...