Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Music Appreciation

IcyPeas

(21,871 posts) Sun Mar 7, 2021, 02:16 AM Mar 2021

The Beatles - Strawberry Fields Forever and Penny Lane [double A-side single] 1967

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Beatles - Strawberry Fields Forever and Penny Lane [double A-side single] 1967 (Original Post) IcyPeas Mar 2021 OP

Thanks! amerikat Mar 2021 #1

I remember Cartoonist Mar 2021 #2

aah yes all the rumors about Paul being dead IcyPeas Mar 2021 #3

Not to mention Cartoonist Mar 2021 #4

amerikat

(4,909 posts)

1. Thanks!

Reply to IcyPeas (Original post)

Sun Mar 7, 2021, 02:36 AM

Mar 2021

I needed that.

Cartoonist

(7,316 posts)

2. I remember

Reply to IcyPeas (Original post)

Sun Mar 7, 2021, 07:53 AM

Mar 2021

Back then, there was suspicion about the lyrics to some popular songs. Drug references mainly. So one local radio station offered to send the lyrics to concerned parents. A friend of mine got a copy of these songs. They were nicely printed up. Probably would be a nice collectible today.

IcyPeas

(21,871 posts)

3. aah yes all the rumors about Paul being dead

Reply to Cartoonist (Reply #2)

Sun Mar 7, 2021, 04:13 PM

Mar 2021

the ending of strawberry field you can hear something..... is it "cranberry sauce" or "Paul is dead" I remember that. and supposedly you'd hear more messages if you played it backwards.

I guess that was fake news and conspiracy theories back in 1967.

Cartoonist

(7,316 posts)

4. Not to mention

Reply to IcyPeas (Original post)

Sun Mar 7, 2021, 04:17 PM

Mar 2021

While they were busy looking for drug references, they completely missed "finger pie".

Reply to this discussion