Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

flamin lib

(14,559 posts)
Wed Jun 10, 2020, 04:43 PM Jun 2020

I posted this earlier, then I listened to the lecture here :

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/promotion/15107/optic.html?utm_campaign=2020_06_OpticDay2_US&utm_kxconfid=t5ljhtrz5&utm_source=email_etevent&utm_medium=email&sfmc_sub=5445640

about the difference between images for magazines, blogs and calendars vs home decor.

Original image:

[img]?1[/img]

Reshot in high key:

[img]?1[/img]

Post to go soft:

[img]?1[/img]

I can see how a print 40 inches on the long side would be intrusive in the original and much more pleasing in either of the other two versions. The first would smack you in the face on first sight and not leave you alone as long as you're in the room. The other two would be much more passive and by changing the color balance on the background could be matched to different color schemes.

I'll be rethinking my own home decor. Just 'cause I gravitate to the high impact super sharp in-your-face action doesn't mean my guests will feel the same.

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I posted this earlier, then I listened to the lecture here : (Original Post) flamin lib Jun 2020 OP
TBH, I like the original one the best. Talitha Jun 2020 #1
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Photography»I posted this earlier, th...