Photography
Related: About this forumFalloutShelter
(11,866 posts)I would make prints of that one. JMHO
George McGovern
(5,420 posts)Diamond_Dog
(31,998 posts)Thats fabulous! More like a painting than a photograph! What a cool effect! Well done, George!
George McGovern
(5,420 posts)niyad
(113,302 posts)George McGovern
(5,420 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,615 posts)The shaking is amazing, and at the same time, it's very controlled. Beautiful results!
George McGovern
(5,420 posts)imaginary girl
(861 posts)As in, no mistakes, just happy accidents? I think that was a Bob Ross saying ...
George McGovern
(5,420 posts)William Seger
(10,778 posts)... which was just what it sounds like. But less extreme forms of "kinetic photography" can achieve interesting results: Camera Shake: Not Just For Deleting Anymore
George McGovern
(5,420 posts)This was the second frame trying to show sunlight through a tree. I set the f/stop way too high and clicked, but after a split second the shutter hadn't snapped so I just lowered the viewfinder and found this image on the LCD. Was going to delete, but, like the article you linked says: "Think of camera shake not as an accident of using a slow shutter speed but as a tool for creating forms and shapes that wouldn't have otherwise been in the photo, or enhancing the shapes that are already there."
And that's exactly what happened! Creativity. (But I won't be tossing my Olympus in the air . . .)