Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ptah

(33,028 posts)
Fri Oct 18, 2013, 11:32 PM Oct 2013

menstrual cycles might be too problematic for women to serve in combat



... said in an Arizona Daily Star news story that menstrual cycles might be too problematic for women to serve in combat...
<snip>
Earlier this summer, Proud announced she would be a Republican candidate for one of the two seats available for the Arizona State House of Representatives in Legislative District 11.

http://azstarnet.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/former-arizona-lawmaker-terri-proud-files-k-claim-against-the/article_f048bddf-892b-58f7-a2a7-924048184d5e.html
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
menstrual cycles might be too problematic for women to serve in combat (Original Post) Ptah Oct 2013 OP
Shades of Newt. enlightenment Oct 2013 #1
Even in support roles, IrishAyes Oct 2013 #2
Well, Newt seemed to think enlightenment Oct 2013 #4
You cannot measure heart Southside Oct 2013 #5
To be honest, enlightenment Oct 2013 #6
I'd like to hope so haha Southside Oct 2013 #7
I think we're pretty much past the point where we care what the hell Newt thinks, aren't we? IrishAyes Oct 2013 #8
Of course. enlightenment Oct 2013 #10
Probably because we all love to kick GOP butt every chance we get. IrishAyes Oct 2013 #11
Probably. enlightenment Oct 2013 #12
Wonder what Leviticus says about this. longship Oct 2013 #3
Story time, y'all IrishAyes Oct 2013 #9

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
4. Well, Newt seemed to think
Sat Oct 19, 2013, 09:48 AM
Oct 2013

it was a problem because "women get infections and they don't have much upper-body strength" (that in one sentence, thereby tying two completely different irrelevant nonsenses together).

As a woman and a vet, I certainly don't think there's any difference.

Southside

(338 posts)
5. You cannot measure heart
Sat Oct 19, 2013, 12:10 PM
Oct 2013

We need to get away from generalizations of what people can and can't do, stop putting ceilings on potential.

Thank you for your service.

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
6. To be honest,
Sat Oct 19, 2013, 12:25 PM
Oct 2013

my upper body strength has never been good . . . but that's just me! As you said, generalizations are ridiculous.

And you're welcome (but thanks aren't necessary, imo - we all do something that benefits others, don't we? )

longship

(40,416 posts)
3. Wonder what Leviticus says about this.
Sat Oct 19, 2013, 02:16 AM
Oct 2013

Unclean women cannot do lots of things according to the Bible. What makes them unclean? Just the fact that they are women?

Silly bullshit if you ask me.

Too bad this rubbish leaks into culture. People are people, no matter their gender.

IrishAyes

(6,151 posts)
9. Story time, y'all
Sat Oct 19, 2013, 03:07 PM
Oct 2013

One of my best friends in the L.A. days was an equally tiny but far prettier young lady who worked as an official police bodyguard for visiting dignitaries from far and wide. Linda had exquisite manners and looked like arm candy but she could beat the crap out of almost anybody, and I can testify to that because I saw her do it in full contact karate tournaments.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Arizona»menstrual cycles might be...