Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
California
Related: About this forum
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1141 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California to Florida: We're better, and stop the stunts (Original Post)
KamaAina
May 2016
OP
Yeah, that's an awkward way to put it. Probably should have said that property currently
petronius
May 2016
#4
djean111
(14,255 posts)1. Oh, that is AWESOME!
I live in Florida. Rick Scott reeks.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)2. Good on the Guv. Texas tried it a few years ago, as well. Same results.
Qutzupalotl
(14,313 posts)3. One quibble:
The value of property below high tide levels will most likely plummet.
petronius
(26,602 posts)4. Yeah, that's an awkward way to put it. Probably should have said that property currently
valued at that amount will soon be worth a whole lot less.
Good for our Guv! (And while Scott will probably ignore it, I'm going to take his advice and read the report...)
PADemD
(4,482 posts)5. This should have been an open letter published in FL newspapers.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)6. It still could be. Who'd pony up for something like that?
Tom Steyer, maybe?