Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 05:45 PM Jun 2016

PG&E agrees to close Diablo Canyon in 2025

http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/article84993992.html

In a momentous decision with far-reaching consequences, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. has announced it will not pursue license renewal for the two reactors at Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant and will close it in 2025 — ending a tumultuous 31-year relationship with the community and causing an annual economic impact of nearly $1 billion locally.

The closure is part of an agreement with labor and environmental organizations announced Tuesday in which the utility agrees to increase investment in energy efficiency, renewable power and electricity storage to offset the power that will no longer be produced by the nuclear plant.

Closing Diablo Canyon will mean the end of an era in nuclear power in California. Diablo is the last nuclear power plant operating in the state, after the 2012 shutdown of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station in San Clemente.

“California’s energy landscape is changing dramatically with energy efficiency, renewable and storage being central to the state’s energy policy,” PG&E’s Chairman Tony Earley said in a prepared statement. “As we make this transition, Diablo Canyon’s full output will no longer be required.”


3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
PG&E agrees to close Diablo Canyon in 2025 (Original Post) KamaAina Jun 2016 OP
That's a lot of land that I hope is kept as open-space, and made more accessible petronius Jun 2016 #1
The reactors might have been have been forced to close sooner, but I suspect they struck deal Brother Buzz Jun 2016 #2
To be replaced by something worse, without a doubt. hunter Jun 2016 #3

petronius

(26,602 posts)
1. That's a lot of land that I hope is kept as open-space, and made more accessible
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 06:19 PM
Jun 2016

It would be great to see some hiking and biking trails connecting Avila Beach to Montana de Oro, and up over the Irish Hills. It would be a lot less nice to see developments filling in that area. (Although I suppose maybe one really nice and affordable ocean-view house--for me, natch--would be acceptable... )

Brother Buzz

(36,416 posts)
2. The reactors might have been have been forced to close sooner, but I suspect they struck deal
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 07:49 PM
Jun 2016

JUNE 21, 2016

5 More U.S. Nukes to Close, Will Diablo Canyon Be Next?

by HARVEY WASSERMAN


A rising tsunami of U.S. nuke shut-downs may soon include California’s infamous Diablo Canyon double reactors. But it depends on citizen action, including a statewide petition.

Five U.S. reactor closures have been announced within the past month. A green regulatory decision on California’s environmental standards could push the number to seven.

The focus is now on a critical June 28 California State Lands Commission meeting. Set for Sacramento, the hearing could help make the Golden State totally nuke free, ending the catastrophic radioactive and global warming impacts caused by these failing plants. A public simulcast of the Sacramento meeting is expected to gather a large crowd at the Morro Bay Community Center near the reactor site. The meeting starts at 10 a.m., but environmental groups will rally outside the community center starting at 9 a.m.

The three State Lands Commissioners will decide whether to require a legally-mandated Environmental Impact Report under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). If ordered, a public scoping process will begin, allowing interested groups and individuals to weigh in on the environmental impacts of operation of two nuclear reactors on California’s fragile coastline.

In 1969 and 1970 PG&E got state leases for tidewater acreage for Diablo’s cooling system. These leases are set to expire in 2018 and 2019. If the State Lands Commission does not renew them, both reactors will be forced to shut down.

<more>

http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/06/21/5-more-u-s-nukes-to-close-will-diablo-canyon-be-next/

hunter

(38,310 posts)
3. To be replaced by something worse, without a doubt.
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 08:58 PM
Jun 2016

Fracked gas and it's window-dressing of solar and wind power, and increasing "property values" will encourage further coastal development.

Just as electric car use is accelerating.

There are no winners in high energy industrial economies.

Big Money has destroyed most of the California I loved.

No worries. In ten years the climate change monster will probably be chewing on the U.S.A. hard. Maybe we'll change our minds about large electric grids, automobiles, and all that other environmentally destructive rot.

Until then I see most anti-nuclear activism as another flavor of climate change denial.

I protested this plant when it was built, but I won't cheer its closure.

Cheap fracked gas is the devil.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»PG&E agrees to close Diab...