Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sl8

(13,702 posts)
Sun Sep 27, 2020, 06:40 AM Sep 2020

OC sheriff's deputies who lied on reports testify that they didn't know it was illegal

https://www.ocregister.com/2020/09/25/oc-sheriffs-deputies-who-lied-on-reports-testify-that-they-didnt-know-it-was-illegal/amp/

OC sheriff’s deputies who lied on reports testify that they didn’t know it was illegal

Tony Saavedra
PUBLISHED: September 25, 2020 at 6:18 p.m. | UPDATED: September 25, 2020 at 6:18 p.m.

Two fired Orange County sheriff’s deputies convicted of lying on their police reports testified recently before a grand jury that they didn’t know it was illegal to falsify the documents, transcripts show.

Joseph Anthony Atkinson Jr., 39, and Bryce Richmond Simpson, 31, had neglected to book evidence but falsified their reports to say they had. The once routine practice of sheriff’s deputies booking evidence by the end of their shifts, as required by department policy and state law, was ignored for years in hundreds of cases where evidence was booked late or not at all, an internal audit found.

Atkinson and Simpson, considered the worst offenders in the department’s “evidence scandal,” were allowed to plead guilty in June to a misdemeanor charge of willful omission to perform their official duty and were given one year informal probation, with no jail time, no community service and no fine.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
OC sheriff's deputies who lied on reports testify that they didn't know it was illegal (Original Post) sl8 Sep 2020 OP
Most common police defenses: fear and ignorance OneBro Sep 2020 #1
I was alwayd told ignorance of the law is no excuse Fullduplexxx Sep 2020 #2
Held to a higher standard I see... mikelgb Sep 2020 #3

OneBro

(1,159 posts)
1. Most common police defenses: fear and ignorance
Sun Sep 27, 2020, 07:45 AM
Sep 2020

“I was afraid,” or “I was too stupid to know any better.”

From the article:
Special prosecutor Patrick K. O’Toole told grand jurors that he gave the plea deal to Atkinson and Simpson partially because they had not been informed of the Penal Code section for lying on a official report.

“So I let them plead to the less serious charge because I thought it was justified under the circumstances,” O’Toole told the jurors. “And I think you will recall also their testimony that, not that ignorance of the law is any excuse, but . . .”
Yes, he actually said that.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»OC sheriff's deputies who...