What are your thoughts on the propositions for 2020?

[Initech]

I know to vote no on 22 (Uber / Lyft) and 23 (dialysis), are there any others that I need to know going in?

[dhill926]

1. here's a voter's guide from Courage California...

there are others out there as well. MoveOn, etc.

https://progressivevotersguide.com/california/2020/general/choose

[Cosmo Blues]

2. I already voted

All I can tell you is from my research I voted no on H scene, 20, 22, and 23 I voted yes on the others

[Auggie]

3. California Democrats Endorsement:

YES ON
PROP 14
PROP 15
PROP 16
PROP 17
PROP 18
PROP 19
PROP 21
PROP 23
PROP 25

NO ON
PROP 20
PROP 22

NEUTRAL ON
PROP 24

https://cademorg-media.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/28204844/CDP-PropEnsorsements__Interactive.pdf

I voted NO on 24 ... nice thought, but way too ambiguously worded.

[Initech]

4. Yes on 23? I thought 23 was sponsored by DaVita.

[Auggie]

5. DaVita is listed as opposed to 23 ...

according to this link:

https://abc7.com/california-ballot-measures-november-2020-ca-props-propositions-guide-to/6419431/

Here's another:

https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_23,_Dialysis_Clinic_Requirements_Initiative_(2020)

Opponents
The campaign Stop the Dangerous & Costly Dialysis Proposition provided a list of involved organizations on the campaign's website, which is available here.

Political Parties
Republican Party of California

Corporations
DaVita, Inc.
Fresenius Medical Care

Organizations
AMVETS, Department of California
American Legion, Department of California
California Medical Association
California NAACP State Conference

Republican Party! Holy jumping' catfish ... what more do you need?

[Zorro]

6. I voted No on 23

I saw no compelling reason for an on-site nephrologist.

Dialysis sites are staffed with nursing professionals that I believe are trained sufficiently to handle patient needs.