California Voters, here's the cheat sheet from cadem.org

[usonian]

https://cadem.org/

Endorsements:


Propositions:


CADEM is neutral on prop 26, and against prop 27.
26 seems to limit sports wagering to in-person gambling on tribal lands and "certain horseracing tracks"
27 seems to allow Indian tribes and affiliated businesses (what?) to operate online/mobile sports wagering outside tribal lands.

In more local detail (pdf) https://cadem.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/2022-CADEM-General-Endorsements.pdf
No recommendations found for judicial positions.

There are some interesting cases, such as two Democrats running for state senator.

[JohnSJ]

1. This the third time they have tried to push prop 29 dialysis measure on the ballot, and it was

rejected twice. I will be voting no on that one

They are trying to force dialysis clinics to unionize by making it a law through the proposition mechanism, and that is simply wrong

It is up to the workers in those facilities to unionize if they want, not through the initiative process
in my view

[Mz Pip]

2. I voted no , too

Enough already.

[Retrograde]

3. Same here

Last edited Wed Oct 19, 2022, 02:28 AM - Edit history (1)

Let's hope they follow Lewis Carroll's advice on snark hunting: "What I tell you three times is true"

[quaint]

4. Absolutely NO.

[beaglelover]

5. I'm only voting YES on Props 1 and 31.

I can't believe they want us to vote YES on prop 30. Since when to Democrats support corporate welfare?

[usonian]

6. Well, you made me read it. (I have been busy and will vote shortly)

If I read the arguments right, one could make the case that it's welfare for Lyft, funded by people making over 2 million.

Like someone said of Musk (I think it was the Mayor of San Francisco) ... he took the tax break and left the state (HQ, anyway).

Thanks for pointing this out. Worth reading.

[beaglelover]

7. Also, Newsom made an ad to vote against this proposition. I"m with him on this.