Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
California
Related: About this forumWhat's true in the SB15 (drone control) bill and why does the ACLU want it stopped?
I am confused.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1671 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What's true in the SB15 (drone control) bill and why does the ACLU want it stopped? (Original Post)
antiquie
Aug 2013
OP
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)1. They want a moratorium
http://www.news10.net/news/article/243416/2/Legislature-moves-bills-to-regulate-drone-aircraft
The statistic quoted in a Senate committee hearing on Tuesday says a lot about why lawmakers are quickly moving to regulate unmanned drone aircraft: officials estimate 10,000 of the vehicles will be in the nation's skies by the end of the decade.
"To put that into perspective," said state Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Pacoima, "at any given time, there are about 5,000 airplanes in U.S. airspace." ...
Both proposals would create a new regulatory structure for using the remotely controlled aircraft in California. Padilla's bill, SB 15, would add the planes and helicopters to existing definitions of what can be considered an invasion of privacy. Both bills would generally require a warrant from police and law enforcement that want to use the devices. AB 1327 also includes a provision that officers would have to destroy surveillance video or photos within ten days....
"You know, it's a wartime technology being brought to your neighborhood," said Valerie Small Navarro of the ACLU California. "So it makes sense to actually adopt a moratorium and think about it carefully."
"To put that into perspective," said state Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Pacoima, "at any given time, there are about 5,000 airplanes in U.S. airspace." ...
Both proposals would create a new regulatory structure for using the remotely controlled aircraft in California. Padilla's bill, SB 15, would add the planes and helicopters to existing definitions of what can be considered an invasion of privacy. Both bills would generally require a warrant from police and law enforcement that want to use the devices. AB 1327 also includes a provision that officers would have to destroy surveillance video or photos within ten days....
"You know, it's a wartime technology being brought to your neighborhood," said Valerie Small Navarro of the ACLU California. "So it makes sense to actually adopt a moratorium and think about it carefully."
antiquie
(4,299 posts)2. Ah, thanks very much.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)3. Does the bill address private use?
Can a private corproation, or even a private individual, use them to spy on one's neighbors? What are the limits.