Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lostincalifornia

(5,429 posts)
Wed Apr 15, 2026, 12:01 PM Yesterday

I think Matt Mahan is going to make it more likely that a republican will be in the general election for Governor.

Mahan is currently Mayor of San Jose, and Silicon Valley is throwing tons of money for his campaign.

As a Mayor, not only he hasn't been in that long, he hasn't done much in my opinion, and now with all the silcon valley money pouring into his campaign for governor, he is really gumming up the race in my view, and actually making it more likely that a MAGA will be in the general election.

Democrats better unify behind one candidate quickly, or our STUPID jungle primary is going to make the possibility of having a MAGA Governor a reality.

and anyone who thinks this cannot happen in California, this state elected arnold schwarzenegger, ronald reagan, etc.



10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I think Matt Mahan is going to make it more likely that a republican will be in the general election for Governor. (Original Post) lostincalifornia Yesterday OP
At least Steyer could self fund JBTaurus83 Yesterday #1
I don't either but right now he is polling second to hilton. lostincalifornia Yesterday #4
This sure seems like an argument for ranked choice voting genxlib Yesterday #2
no, it is an argument for getting rid of the jungle primnary, and letting each party determine their nominee for the lostincalifornia Yesterday #3
"Why in the hell are so many Democrats running... 3catwoman3 Yesterday #5
I wouldn't be surprised if a couple of them aren't being paid by the GOP to stay in the race. hedda_foil Yesterday #6
Wouldn't be surprised. The only positive is that swalwell is out before any votes lostincalifornia Yesterday #8
We dodged a bullet, he would have lost. JBTaurus83 Yesterday #9
We sure did, and why I didn't by into the speculation by some that this was all roger stone. It didn't make sense. If lostincalifornia Yesterday #10
You are so right. lostincalifornia Yesterday #7

JBTaurus83

(1,533 posts)
1. At least Steyer could self fund
Wed Apr 15, 2026, 12:06 PM
Yesterday

I admit I don’t know much about him other than his environmental activism.

genxlib

(6,148 posts)
2. This sure seems like an argument for ranked choice voting
Wed Apr 15, 2026, 12:07 PM
Yesterday

Not only would it better reflect the will of the people, it could conceivably be done in a single election instead of primary

Any idea why they do it this way? It seems to have no discernable upside with a definitive down side

lostincalifornia

(5,429 posts)
3. no, it is an argument for getting rid of the jungle primnary, and letting each party determine their nominee for the
Wed Apr 15, 2026, 12:11 PM
Yesterday

general election.

The jungle primary is the most stupid idea ever created.

and while they are at it they should increase the threshold for recall to a number that actually represent a state our size, at least 25% signatures, instead of the around 12% necessary.

Why in the hell are so many Democrats running in this race, when some know they have no chance of winning, but only splitting votes.

3catwoman3

(29,555 posts)
5. "Why in the hell are so many Democrats running...
Wed Apr 15, 2026, 12:19 PM
Yesterday

...in this race, when some know they have no chance of winning, but only splitting votes."

I ask myself that every time I see a primary with more that 3-4 candidates. Surely people polling at 5% or less must know they have no chance.

Our party seems to be good, as the inverted saying goes, of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

hedda_foil

(16,994 posts)
6. I wouldn't be surprised if a couple of them aren't being paid by the GOP to stay in the race.
Wed Apr 15, 2026, 12:24 PM
Yesterday

lostincalifornia

(5,429 posts)
8. Wouldn't be surprised. The only positive is that swalwell is out before any votes
Wed Apr 15, 2026, 01:02 PM
Yesterday

Last edited Wed Apr 15, 2026, 04:04 PM - Edit history (1)

Were cast.

JBTaurus83

(1,533 posts)
9. We dodged a bullet, he would have lost.
Wed Apr 15, 2026, 03:15 PM
Yesterday

Talk about selfish, getting into such an important race with that type of baggage.

lostincalifornia

(5,429 posts)
10. We sure did, and why I didn't by into the speculation by some that this was all roger stone. It didn't make sense. If
Wed Apr 15, 2026, 04:07 PM
Yesterday

it was something like that it would have been after the primary, and closer to the general election. Something like was done to Hillary, and Hillary actually didn't actually do anything wrong.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»I think Matt Mahan is goi...