Prop 28 (Term Limits): Yes or No?

[Auggie]

Proposition 28, if voters approve it, will:

Reduce the total number of years a politician can serve in the California State Legislature from 14 years to 12 years.

Permit a legislator to serve these 12 years in either the California State Senate or the California State Assembly. This change would increase the number of years that a legislator could serve in either of those chambers. Proposition 28 would increase the number of years a legislator could remain in the California State Assembly from 6 years to 12 years. It would increase the number of years a legislator could remain in the California State Senate from 8 years to 12 years.

Wiki: http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/California_Proposition_28,_Change_in_Term_Limits_(June_2012)

4 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
	Yes
	3 (75%)
	No
	1 (25%)
	0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

[Warren Stupidity]

1. Term limits are only an issue in red states.

The strategy is transparent.

[FreeState]

2. I voted no

I think term limits hurt more than they help, especially on the local level.

[pinto]

3. Statements, pro and con, via the official CA voter guide here ->

http://www.voterguide.sos.ca.gov

[ellisonz]

4. Yes!

Term Limits have been a disaster. Increasing the amount of time one can serve in a single position will reduce job swapping.

- California voter