Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tawadi

(2,110 posts)
Sat May 26, 2012, 07:48 PM May 2012

Ex-football player, wrongly jailed for rape, wants money from state

May 26, 2012 | 7:53 am

A former high school football star who had his rape conviction dismissed plans no legal action against the woman who recanted the sexual assault claim she made 10 years ago.

But Brian Banks, 26, does plan to file a claim against the state, seeking money for his time behind bars, his attorney said.

"We do not plan on taking any legal action against Gibson," said Banks' attorney, Justin Brooks of the California Innocence Project, referring to Banks' accuser, Wanetta Gibson. "We do plan on filing a state claim for the $100 a day Brian is entitled to under State Law 4900 for every day he was wrongfully incarcerated."

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-brian-banks-conviction-dismissed-pictures,0,4628359.photogallery

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ex-football player, wrongly jailed for rape, wants money from state (Original Post) tawadi May 2012 OP
Post removed Post removed May 2012 #1
I think they should definitey press charges against her. eom tawadi May 2012 #2
I would agree. TheWraith May 2012 #3
I don't think suing the state for giving the wrong verdict in a trial is a good precedent XemaSab May 2012 #4

Response to tawadi (Original post)

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
3. I would agree.
Sat May 26, 2012, 11:21 PM
May 2012

Unfortunately, false accusations of rape almost always carry little to no consequences.

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
4. I don't think suing the state for giving the wrong verdict in a trial is a good precedent
Mon May 28, 2012, 01:47 AM
May 2012

If that were the case, then why wouldn't a victim's family be able to sue the state for letting a murderer go?

There are probably some guilty people who are let off and some innocent people who are convicted, but short of gross negligence on the part of a governmental agency, how is the state culpable in our current system, especially if you have a lying witness?

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»Ex-football player, wrong...