Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Colorado
Related: About this forumSmith: Pot suit filed over legal clarity, not beliefs
Larimer County Sheriff Justin Smith says his lawsuit challenging marijuana legalization in Colorado was not spurred by his own beliefs on pot, but is instead meant to clarify a "quagmire" of conflicting state and federal laws.
"I always tell people, take marijuana out of it and put anything else in there, and look at the constitutional issue of, 'are we going to continue with the principle of federal supremacy?'" Smith told the Coloradoan Thursday morning.
Smith is the lead plaintiff in a federal lawsuit filed Thursday that challenges the state's legalization of recreational marijuana. In it, he argues that being tasked with upholding Colorado's constitutional amendment puts him in direct conflict with the U.S. Constitution and federal law.
"We're to protect the rights of individuals in our state," Smith said. " By defending the right of those individuals (to possess and consume marijuana), it means violating federal law."
"I always tell people, take marijuana out of it and put anything else in there, and look at the constitutional issue of, 'are we going to continue with the principle of federal supremacy?'" Smith told the Coloradoan Thursday morning.
Smith is the lead plaintiff in a federal lawsuit filed Thursday that challenges the state's legalization of recreational marijuana. In it, he argues that being tasked with upholding Colorado's constitutional amendment puts him in direct conflict with the U.S. Constitution and federal law.
"We're to protect the rights of individuals in our state," Smith said. " By defending the right of those individuals (to possess and consume marijuana), it means violating federal law."
the rest from the coloradoan
he'll run opposed in 2016 :barf:
at least he's not on fox blathering about the war on christmas like his predecessor.
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Smith: Pot suit filed over legal clarity, not beliefs (Original Post)
fizzgig
Mar 2015
OP
This idiot yahoo pretty much dislikes everything about the federal government
mountain grammy
Mar 2015
#1
mountain grammy
(28,804 posts)1. This idiot yahoo pretty much dislikes everything about the federal government
except the marijuana prohibition and the second amendment. What a fucking hypocrite. Meantime his department's computer system has been hacked a few times. Probably those stoner techies.
locks
(2,012 posts)2. I'm sure he's always been for federal supremacy and the EPA
and he's worried about the bunnies getting stoned and eating all our gardens and fritos, don't you know? It's a slippery slope, next the prairie dogs, then the coyotes. And have you ever seen a stoned rattlesnake; it's not a pretty sight. What would Colorado ever do without our crazies sitting down in Denver, upholding the State constitution and protecting us from evils like marijuana?
