Massachusetts
Related: About this forumJudge rules Harvard owns slave images, not descendants
March 6 (UPI) -- A Massachusetts judge ruled this week that a series of slave images belong to Harvard University, but the ancestor of the subjects who were forced to strip to the waist for the photos plans to appeal.
Middlesex County Superior Court Justice Camille Sarrouf said Tamara Lanier, who brought the lawsuit two years ago, did not own the images since her enslaved ancestors, father and daughter, Renty and Delia, whose photos were taken for a racist study, did not own them when they were taken.
"Fully acknowledging the continuing impact slavery has had in the United States, the law, as it currently stands, does not confer a property interest to the subject of a photograph regardless of how objectionable the photograph's origins may be," Sarrouf wrote in explanation of the judgment filed Tuesday.
Harvard professor Louis Agassiz commissioned the photos in 1850 for a study arguing that Black people were an inferior race. The photos are currently kept in a Harvard University campus museum. But Lanier, whom the court has not disputed is a direct descendant, said they're part of her personal family history.
Read more: https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2021/03/06/judge-rules-slave-images-Harvard-property-ancestor-appeal/1951615046391/
brush
(61,033 posts)should next sue for more than the photos. trump time is over with these repug judges.
MichMan
(16,873 posts)Last edited Sun Mar 7, 2021, 10:18 AM - Edit history (1)
I am an amateur photographer.
I own the images I take, the subject does not. That has been clearly established in case law and taking a photograph applies copyright protection over it.
Can the Mona Lisa descendents therefore claim ownership over the painting?
