Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dflprincess

(28,075 posts)
Sat Dec 31, 2011, 12:34 AM Dec 2011

So I just heard on the 10 o'clock news that Minnesotans will no longer be eligible for extended

unemployment benefits. This is because the state's official unemployment rate has dropped below 6.5%.

This would be good news if we all didn't know the actual unemployment rate is higher - it's bad news for anyone in the state who needs those benefits.

I wonder how much the fact that more and more people have hit even the extended benefit limit has to do with the supposed drop in unemployment?

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So I just heard on the 10 o'clock news that Minnesotans will no longer be eligible for extended (Original Post) dflprincess Dec 2011 OP
Probably right on with the not counted anymore CatholicEdHead Dec 2011 #1
The unemployment rate is not based on a count of the people getting unemployment benefits. progree Jan 2012 #2

progree

(10,901 posts)
2. The unemployment rate is not based on a count of the people getting unemployment benefits.
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 04:17 AM
Jan 2012

Whether one has exhausted their unemployment insurance benefits has nothing to do with the official Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) headline unemployment rate that comes out the first Friday of every month and is widely headlined in the media. That is a myth that will sadly never die. The official headline unemployment rate is based on a monthly household survey of 60,000 households. They count people as unemployed if they are not employed, *and* they tell the suveyor that they have looked for work sometime in the past 4 weeks.

For much more on this, including what constitutes looking for work (pretty lenient standards, but still involve more activity than simply reading job ads) see: http://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm

On the other hand, the official unemployment rate does not count people who have not looked for work in the past 4 weeks, nor does it count people who are part-time employed that are looking for full-time work. (There is a separate figure, also often reported deep down in news articles, the underemployment rate, that counts these 2 groups as well as the "officially" unemployed .

So yes, the official unemployment rate undoubtedly undercounts the number of unemployed people by most standards.

On the other hand, if I were unemployed and still collecting unemployment insurance benefits or other government benefits that were contingent on me making a good faith effort to find work, I would be very reluctant to tell a government surveyor that I haven't made any effort to look for work during the past 4 weeks. i.e. some people who are not employed and not really looking for work, but tell the surveyor they are looking for work, are counted as officially unemployed....

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Minnesota»So I just heard on the 10...