Tue Apr 15, 2014, 06:18 PM
Sherman A1 (33,656 posts)
Missouri will fire deafening 'sound cannons' at drivers to deter work zone speeding
http://www.theverge.com/2014/4/14/5613782/missouri-will-fire-lrad-sound-cannons-to-deter-work-zone-speeding
Apparently the threat of a costly ticket isn't enough to slow down drivers passing through work zones on Missouri's highways, so the state is taking extreme measures to solve the dilemma. Missouri's Department of Transportation is preparing to deploy the LRAD sound cannon — a tool (some might say "weapon" ![]() The state has already conducted tests with LRAD (embedded below), loading it onto the back of a truck and sending out verbal "slow vehicles ahead" warnings to nearby vehicles. But now Missouri has committed to the technology by purchasing two of the pricey devices. Transportation officials claim that they provide an unmistakable alert about slower roadwork vehicles up ahead, and insist LRAD will only be directed at speeding drivers that haven't yet moved out of work lanes. Still, critics maintain that the ear-piercing nature of the alerts presents a clear danger in and of itself. LRAD's sirens can reach up to 153 decibels, more than enough to potentially cause hearing damage. This is technology that's been deployed in war zones, after all. Missouri's DOT reportedly insists the tool will only being used at safe levels, but it's easy to see how motorists could become disoriented and wind up in an accident. The element of surprise is an unwelcome one on the road, and that has many drivers crying foul about Missouri's plans. ![]()
|
7 replies, 1739 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Sherman A1 | Apr 2014 | OP |
Autumn | Apr 2014 | #1 | |
demigoddess | Apr 2014 | #3 | |
Politicalboi | Apr 2014 | #2 | |
gordianot | Apr 2014 | #4 | |
Sherman A1 | Apr 2014 | #7 | |
liberal N proud | Apr 2014 | #5 | |
blkmusclmachine | Apr 2014 | #6 |
Response to Sherman A1 (Original post)
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 06:22 PM
Autumn (39,892 posts)
1. I would think this may very well increase traffic accidents in work zones
Kind of stupid.
|
Response to Autumn (Reply #1)
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 06:36 PM
demigoddess (5,657 posts)
3. you said it!!
you would think that they would know that something like that is dangerous!
|
Response to Sherman A1 (Original post)
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 06:29 PM
Politicalboi (15,189 posts)
2. Why don't they use real cannons
I'm sure a few have them as lawn decorations. Much cheaper as long as they don't shoot the cannon on the highway.
![]() |
Response to Sherman A1 (Original post)
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 06:58 PM
gordianot (14,656 posts)
4. So what happens when a driver loses control and then hits a worker?
Or a workers ears are damaged even if you do not care about car safety.
|
Response to gordianot (Reply #4)
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 04:59 AM
Sherman A1 (33,656 posts)
7. Agreed
What could possibly go wrong with such an innovative and high tech plan such as this one?
![]() Besides we have all these nifty "toys" that are available courtesy of our recent forays into the Mid East and SW Asia that are just begging to be repurposed! ![]() ![]() |
Response to Sherman A1 (Original post)
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 07:08 PM
liberal N proud (58,753 posts)
5. How many heart attacks will this cause?
Blast, driver freaks out, looses control and careens in to the construction area.
Yep, well thought out idea! |
Response to Sherman A1 (Original post)
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 08:00 PM
blkmusclmachine (16,149 posts)
6. WHAT THE F(_)CK ?!?! -- Gov't actively turning against the citizens. Democracy my a$$!!!
![]() |