Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,475 posts)
Fri Aug 19, 2022, 09:47 AM Aug 2022

Viral video of local Sikhs partying with sex workers in Costa Rica subject of lawsuit

Well, whoops.

The First Amendment Retweeted

@USConst_Amend_I
protects your right to share viral videos.

thisisreno.com
Viral video of local Sikhs partying with sex workers in Costa Rica subject of lawsuit
Several members of Reno’s Sikh community are suing over the sharing of videos of them partying with prostitutes during a trip to Costa Rica.


5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Viral video of local Sikhs partying with sex workers in Costa Rica subject of lawsuit (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Aug 2022 OP
Looks like they found what they were Sikhing. CurtEastPoint Aug 2022 #1
So, I don't see the problem! Cant dance with hookers in public? Lol , or is it Sikhs can't? Alexander Of Assyria Aug 2022 #2
It may be worth pointing out... Effete Snob Aug 2022 #3
Thanks for the reply. mahatmakanejeeves Aug 2022 #4
Sikhs in name only, I think.... Karadeniz Aug 2022 #5
 

Alexander Of Assyria

(7,839 posts)
2. So, I don't see the problem! Cant dance with hookers in public? Lol , or is it Sikhs can't?
Fri Aug 19, 2022, 09:54 AM
Aug 2022

Or is it Sikhs don’t know how to dance with hookers?

And the viral part is doubtful…someone is trying too hard to do…something?

How about if Christians Dance with (without evidence) hookers in Public!

Who cares?

 

Effete Snob

(8,387 posts)
3. It may be worth pointing out...
Fri Aug 19, 2022, 10:00 AM
Aug 2022

That the account you are promoting in the OP, Marc Randazza, is an attorney who is known for representing Nazis, white supremacists, and Alex Jones. These are not random happenstances. He actively seeks employment and status among these groups.

https://flatheadbeacon.com/2019/04/26/neo-nazi-website-founders-lawyers-backing-case/

"A neo-Nazi website operator’s attorneys intend to withdraw from representing him in a lawsuit over an anti-Semitic “troll storm” that terrorized a Montana real estate agent’s family.

One of those lawyers, Marc Randazza, told The Associated Press on Friday that his decision stems from his client’s refusal to comply with a court order requiring him to be present in the U.S. for a deposition."


https://www.thedailybeast.com/alex-jones-is-turning-on-his-own-lawyers-in-sandy-hook-case


Both Randazza and Barnes have become celebrity free-speech attorneys among conservatives for their work on behalf of InfoWars and other controversial right-wing clients. Randazza once pleaded guilty to ethical violations in a Nevada Bar investigation into whether he had cut a side-deal with another client’s legal foes.

In a statement, Randazza told The Daily Beast said that other, “utterly terrible” lawyers who have worked for InfoWars are trying to distract from their own mistakes.


https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/individual/jared-taylor

On Dec. 18, 2017, Taylor’s Twitter account, as well as the account for American Renaissance and other white nationalists, was suspended. This was part of Twitter’s new rules banning accounts promoting hate speech and violence. In February 2018, Taylor filed a lawsuit against Twitter on First Amendment grounds. He is being represented by Marc Randazza, who has represented other neo-Nazis including Andrew Anglin of the Daily Stormer.

It may be preferable not to promote, on DU, persons who actively seek the employment of individuals and groups identified by the Southern Poverty Law Center as merchants of hate.

Just my opinion, of course. You may give free publicity to whomever you choose.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,475 posts)
4. Thanks for the reply.
Fri Aug 19, 2022, 10:04 AM
Aug 2022

I've never heard of him before now.

https://twitter.com/USConst_Amend_I 's retweeting seems to have been done solely to highlight the Constitutional implications of the posting of the video, rather than the politics of the attorney.

Sunlight being the best disinfectant, here's more about the guy:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Randazza

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Nevada»Viral video of local Sikh...