New York
Related: About this forumLabor unions split on mayoral endorsements
In this year's mayoral race, the labor movement is a house divided. The Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, boasting 45,000 members in the city, has endorsed City Council Speaker Christine Quinn.
The citys largest union, SEIU Local 1199, which represents 200,000 health care workers, just backed Public Advocate Bill de Blasio. A day later, Local 1180 of the Communication Workers of America came out swinging for city Controller John Liu
It wasnt supposed to be this way. Organized labor hoped to rally behind one Democratic candidate, maximizing its clout and their chances of having a sympathetic ear in City Hall. Instead, the labor movement is hopelessly splintered, as unions one by one peel away to make endorsements on their own.
Read more at http://www.nydailynews.com/news/election/labor-unions-split-mayoral-endorsements-article-1.1354806
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)... been well treated by the status quo over the last 12 yrs and expects more of the same.
I'd say DiBasio is pretty well-positioned to win a run-off against Quinn ... if Weiner's late entrance doesn't con fuse the electorate.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)Greenwich Village radical into an uber-accommodationist de-facto employee of Bloomberg Inc. effectively gives up her right to be taken seriously forever after.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)But...... shucks. Thanks.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)... pic of CQ. First lgbt, first woman, etc.; her election would be demographically symbolic.
But that's IT. *Demographically* symbolic only. In point of fact, her election would ratify everything that is socially and politically backward in our social order: the rule of money; the absolute monopoly of the monied class over the political system; the turning of truth in political discourse itself ON ITS HEAD. That's a hell of a lot more important than demographic "firsts", seems to me.
FWIW, I knew CQ years ago when she was starting out ( volunteered in her first council run, in fact) so I'm not happy to have to oppose her. But the point is not so much that her positions are too conservative; the point is she can't be TRUSTED. She doesn't believe what she says. Yes... all pols shift and change over time; politics, like life, is not simple, nor is it black and white.
But Ms. Quinn's transformation goes well beyond that. She was up here ( in Riverdale) the other nite at a candidates' forum. She conceded that her most monumental betrayal ( she didn't call it that but that's what it was) was pushing thru Bloomberg's term limits repeal. She resorted to the old Ed Koch line about "if you agree with me 100% of the time you need a psychiatrist."
But no apology, no second thoughts and really,as was the case at the time, no coherent explanation. I don't think she gets that that one betrayal... as big as it was... is not seen by her critics in isolation but rather as emblematic of whole series of lower-profile but no less appalling betrayals that ensued as soon as she undertook her collaboration w. Bloomberg.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)downhill. She sold her soul for power.