Federal Judge Rules UNC-Chapel Hill Can Continue to Consider Race in Admissions
Yesterday, a federal judge upheld the principles of affirmative action when she ruled that UNC-Chapel Hill can continue to use race as a factor in considering admissions and that doing so is not unconstitutional or discriminatory.
The ruling comes down in a lawsuit brought by the conservative group Students for Fair Admissions, backed by conservative legal strategist Edward Blum, alleging that white and Asian students faced discrimination in the university's admissions process.
U.S. District Judge Loretta Biggs found that race "is not a defining feature" in the university's admissions—true, as only 8.7 percent of UNC-CH students are Black and 8.7 percent are Hispanic, compared to 57.1 percent who are white and 11.3 percent Asian—and that the university had made efforts to consider "race-neutral" admission strategies.
UNC uses a "highly individualized, holistic admissions program" and considers many different factors in admitting students, Biggs wrote.
Read more: https://indyweek.com/news/orange/federal-judge-rules-unc-chapel-hill-can-continue-to-consider-race-in-admissions/
= new reply since forum marked as read
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.