Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(111,977 posts)
Mon Sep 11, 2017, 06:27 AM Sep 2017

Giant pork producer asks federal court to reinterpret new and controversial NC law, nullify existing

For Murphy-Brown, a major victory in House Bill 467 was not enough.

The world’s largest pork producer has petitioned a federal court to interpret a key part of the controversial law that could nullify 26 lawsuits brought by 541 plaintiffs against the company. While courts are often called upon to interpret laws, in this case, Murphy-Brown is asking a judge to essentially read lawmakers’ minds and divine their intent when they wrote and passed the law.

An amendment to the state’s Right to Farm Act, the controversial legislation capped the amount of money plaintiffs could recover when winning a nuisance lawsuit against industrialized hog farms. Plaintiffs could receive money equivalent to the decrease in the fair-market value of their property — already diminished because of its proximity to stench and flies — but not for odor, mental duress or the general decline in their quality of life.

Gov. Roy Cooper had vetoed the bill, but on May 11, state lawmakers overrode it.

House Bill 467 was now law.

Read more: http://www.ncpolicywatch.com/2017/09/07/giant-pork-producer-asks-federal-court-reinterpret-new-controversial-nc-law-nullify-existing-nuisance-lawsuits/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Giant pork producer asks federal court to reinterpret new and controversial NC law, nullify existing (Original Post) TexasTowelie Sep 2017 OP
Once again strong evidence of Quid Pro Quo and campaign bribes. Dustlawyer Sep 2017 #1
Quick, someone call Ted Cruz !!!! OnDoutside Sep 2017 #2

Dustlawyer

(10,494 posts)
1. Once again strong evidence of Quid Pro Quo and campaign bribes.
Mon Sep 11, 2017, 06:47 AM
Sep 2017

One is illegal and one is not, neither are investigated.

People, we must demand real campaign finance reform and make it an issue in every election.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»North Carolina»Giant pork producer asks ...