Texas

ashling

(25,771 posts) Tue Jun 23, 2015, 01:28 PM Jun 2015

Defiant Texas man nails 6-foot wooden Confederate flag to building across from county courthouse

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Defiant Texas man nails 6-foot wooden Confederate flag to building across from county courthouse (Original Post) ashling Jun 2015 OP

Is there a law that says you can't deface the confederate flag? Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2015 #1

Montague, Texas bmbmd Jun 2015 #2

LOL! Freedumb of Screech! freshwest Jun 2015 #3

Maybe there is something in nykym Jun 2015 #4

Not a day goes by that Dr. Xavier Jun 2015 #5

That's a double negative, ain't it? Dr. Xavier Jun 2015 #6

Rosa Luxemburg

(28,627 posts)

1. Is there a law that says you can't deface the confederate flag?

Reply to ashling (Original post)

Tue Jun 23, 2015, 01:30 PM

Jun 2015

bmbmd

(3,088 posts)

2. Montague, Texas

Reply to ashling (Original post)

Tue Jun 23, 2015, 01:33 PM

Jun 2015

I drive through there all the time. That garage door has been up for years, right across from the courthouse. I'm surprised it has never been vandalized.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)

3. LOL! Freedumb of Screech!

Reply to ashling (Original post)

Tue Jun 23, 2015, 01:56 PM

Jun 2015

nykym

(3,063 posts)

4. Maybe there is something in

Reply to ashling (Original post)

Tue Jun 23, 2015, 01:57 PM

Jun 2015

the county code about unusually large displays of stupidity.

Dr. Xavier

(278 posts)

5. Not a day goes by that

Reply to ashling (Original post)

Tue Jun 23, 2015, 04:27 PM

Jun 2015

I don't forget to thank my granny for moving my daddy out of that God forsaken place almost 90 years ago. They moved to LA, where my daddy met my mom and several years later I was born. Thanks Granny, wherever you are!

Dr. Xavier

(278 posts)

6. That's a double negative, ain't it?

Reply to Dr. Xavier (Reply #5)

Tue Jun 23, 2015, 04:28 PM

Jun 2015

Sorry, I'm looking at the first sentence and can't for the life of me figure out how to fix it. Must be the texan in me...

Reply to this discussion