Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Texas
Related: About this forumHigh-Profile Group of Lawyers Seeks to Suspend or Disbar Texas AG Ken Paxton
Link to tweet
A group of Texas lawyers, including four past presidents of the State Bar of Texas, filed a complaint Wednesday asking bar regulators to suspend or disbar Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton for actions supporting efforts to overturn the result of the 2020 presidential election.
Asserting Paxton has brought dishonor to his fellow Texas lawyers and the legal profession, the group of 16 prominent Texas lawyers and the group Lawyers Defending American Democracy said in the complaint that Paxton has engaged in a pattern of serious violations of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct.
The group cited the U.S. Supreme Court action Paxton filed in December 2020 seeking to overturn the election results, which the court dismissed for lack of standing. He wanted the court to enjoin four states that went for Democrat Joe Biden from using the results of their elections to appoint electors, and instead to appoint new electors or none at all.
The complaint also alleges Paxton continued after that to engage in ethical violations in support of Trumps effort to overturn the election results, including by urging a crowd of people near the White House on Jan. 6 to march to the U.S. Capital to pressure Congress to change what it was meeting to do, which was to properly count Electoral College votes and declare the rightful winner.
The lawyers allege in the complaint that Paxtons conduct cannot be acceptable from any licensed lawyer in the U.S., let alone the attorney general of a state.
Asserting Paxton has brought dishonor to his fellow Texas lawyers and the legal profession, the group of 16 prominent Texas lawyers and the group Lawyers Defending American Democracy said in the complaint that Paxton has engaged in a pattern of serious violations of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct.
The group cited the U.S. Supreme Court action Paxton filed in December 2020 seeking to overturn the election results, which the court dismissed for lack of standing. He wanted the court to enjoin four states that went for Democrat Joe Biden from using the results of their elections to appoint electors, and instead to appoint new electors or none at all.
The complaint also alleges Paxton continued after that to engage in ethical violations in support of Trumps effort to overturn the election results, including by urging a crowd of people near the White House on Jan. 6 to march to the U.S. Capital to pressure Congress to change what it was meeting to do, which was to properly count Electoral College votes and declare the rightful winner.
The lawyers allege in the complaint that Paxtons conduct cannot be acceptable from any licensed lawyer in the U.S., let alone the attorney general of a state.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 539 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
High-Profile Group of Lawyers Seeks to Suspend or Disbar Texas AG Ken Paxton (Original Post)
LetMyPeopleVote
Jul 2021
OP
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,126 posts)1. Texas AG Paxton Faces Another Ethics Complaint for Election Lawsuits
Link to tweet
Last Wednesday, a group of four past Texas State Bar presidents, state bar members and Texas legal ethics experts filed an ethics complaint against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) asking the Texas State Bar to permanently suspend or disbar him for ethical misconduct. The complaint asserts that Attorney General Paxton, the highest law officer of the State of Texas, has brought dishonor to his fellow Texas lawyers and to the legal profession through his attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. The state Attorney General is already facing other ethics investigations as well as criminal charges in separate cases.
The 31-page complaint outlines various patterns of ethical misconduct, mainly Paxtons petition to the U.S. Supreme Court asking it to overturn the election results of four swing states based on bogus allegations of fraud and unconstitutional actions of state legislatures. While the Supreme Court dismissed the case, finding that Paxton had not justified Texas interest in the conduct of other states elections, the ethics complaint argues that his lawsuit was frivolous, knowingly false and had no basis in fact. The complaint also highlights the ethical concerns regarding Paxtons attempts to block certification by urging people to march on the Capitol on January 6. Regarding Paxtons support of the January 6 insurrection, the complaint argues that Mr. Paxtons post-dismissal, unethical conduct was serious in its own right. Demonstrating a pattern of ethical misconduct, it made his prior conduct in the Supreme Court lawsuit even more egregious.
The 31-page complaint outlines various patterns of ethical misconduct, mainly Paxtons petition to the U.S. Supreme Court asking it to overturn the election results of four swing states based on bogus allegations of fraud and unconstitutional actions of state legislatures. While the Supreme Court dismissed the case, finding that Paxton had not justified Texas interest in the conduct of other states elections, the ethics complaint argues that his lawsuit was frivolous, knowingly false and had no basis in fact. The complaint also highlights the ethical concerns regarding Paxtons attempts to block certification by urging people to march on the Capitol on January 6. Regarding Paxtons support of the January 6 insurrection, the complaint argues that Mr. Paxtons post-dismissal, unethical conduct was serious in its own right. Demonstrating a pattern of ethical misconduct, it made his prior conduct in the Supreme Court lawsuit even more egregious.