Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Texas
Related: About this forumStuart Leavenworth: Again, a cartoonist sparks a national conversation

I'm proud that we published Ohman's cartoon, and equally pleased to see editorials, cartoons and a recent outpouring of personal notes and emails in support of the stand we took. That said, it is also important to recognize the unforeseen impact cartoons can have, because, as Navasky puts it, "they speak in image language other than words."
And we learned three things about Perry during this episode:
1) He knows how to rile up his base.
2) He is clever at deflecting attention.
3) Hmmm I can't seem to remember the third one.
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2013/05/05/5393838/again-a-cartoonist-sparks-a-national.html#storylink=cpy
http://www.sacbee.com/2013/05/05/5393838/again-a-cartoonist-sparks-a-national.html
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Stuart Leavenworth: Again, a cartoonist sparks a national conversation (Original Post)
white cloud
May 2013
OP
Response to white cloud (Original post)
white cloud This message was self-deleted by its author.
dballance
(5,756 posts)2. Linked article is behind a pay-wall
Please don't post to links that require people to subscribe to a newspaper to read the article.
Response to dballance (Reply #2)
white cloud This message was self-deleted by its author.
mbperrin
(7,672 posts)4. I didn't find that so. I clicked on the link and took me right to it.
And I most definitely don't subscribe to the SacBee.
white cloud
(2,567 posts)5. My fault
I had added a link to Caller time that is a subscribe
dballance
(5,756 posts)6. It didn't work the first time I tried it but now it does.
I dunno, I promise it asked me to subscribe the first time I tried the link. Maybe the paper made that article available without subscription if it saw a lot of clicks going to it. They'll be better off telling advertisers about clicks than getting a 9.95 subscription or two.