Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sl8

(14,703 posts)
Thu May 23, 2024, 07:19 AM May 23

For Wake Boat Opponents, New Vermont Rules Mean New Battles

Last edited Thu May 23, 2024, 08:25 AM - Edit history (1)

https://www.sevendaysvt.com/news/for-wake-boat-opponents-new-vermont-rules-mean-new-battles-40955281

For Wake Boat Opponents, New Vermont Rules Mean New Battles

By ANNE WALLACE ALLEN
Published May 22, 2024 at 10:00 a.m.



People surfing behind a wake boat - courtesy of the National Marine Manufacturers association - ANNE WALLACE ALLEN ©️ SEVEN DAYS

Vermonters seeking to limit the use of powerful wake boats on the state's lakes and ponds made it partway to their goal this year. A new rule limits where the motorized craft can be used for surfing, and it's the most restrictive in the country.

The Department of Environmental Conservation's rule, which went into effect on April 15, restricts wake sports to lakes that have a surface area of at least 50 acres and a depth of 20 feet. Even then, surfing must be undertaken at least 500 feet from shore.

Only 30 of the several hundred lakes and ponds in Vermont are large enough to accommodate a wake sports zone. Now people who live or boat on some of those lakes are looking for other ways to limit the sport.

"The situation is now potentially worse than it was before," said Meg Handler, who lives in Hinesburg on 229-acre Lake Iroquois. "Now wake sports are explicitly welcomed onto what is a tiny lake. The potential for abuse is there, and there is no enforcement."

[...]



============

Wikipedia: Wakeboard boats

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wakeboard_boat

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

erronis

(15,842 posts)
2. These will destroy the coastlines and any sense of idyllic nature
Thu May 23, 2024, 08:33 AM
May 23

Have to imagine that there's a substantial overlap between these users and climate denialists and MAGAs.

Bumbles

(58 posts)
3. Why are so many hellbent to destroy what is beautiful and enjoyed by others?
Thu May 23, 2024, 09:38 AM
May 23

Last edited Thu May 23, 2024, 10:40 AM - Edit history (1)

I live in Maine near a shallow saltwater bay that is enjoyed by boaters, fishermen and appreciators of nature. The bay has been taken over by a commercial oyster farm, which is depositing sludge along the banks of this shallow, not-self-cleaning body of water. Our local government is reviewing their application for a 150-foot-long pier out into the near reaches of the bay, disrupting the quietude of neighbors and others who enjoy the serenity still present. I believe the fix is in. This water, which used to nourish shellfish and other spawning species is now bereft of precious eel grass that was the critical component for the life of this bay. This loss is probably irreversible. As has been said, follow the money.

SarahD

(1,646 posts)
4. The right to have fun.
Thu May 23, 2024, 09:39 AM
May 23

Many people believe recreation justifies environmental destruction. Dune buggies run over animals. Mountain bikers build trails and destroy sensitive vegetation. And so on. If you try to restrict my fun in any way, you're a Nazi.

RainCaster

(11,047 posts)
5. The operator is legally responsible for their wake
Thu May 23, 2024, 10:33 AM
May 23

That's been international maritime law for centuries. I was very well aware of that whenever I was out on the water.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Vermont»For Wake Boat Opponents, ...