Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(80,853 posts)
Thu Jun 22, 2017, 10:04 PM Jun 2017

Idiot Rep, Glenn Grothman, Teabagger, defends gerrymandering...

He is as stupid as Trump


Jun 21


Congressman offers a rousing defense of gerrymandering
https://thinkprogress.org/glenn-grothman-gerrymandering-scotus-case-b1821c4e5ee2


“I’m not sure there should be any restrictions whatsoever.”



House Speaker Paul Ryan of Wis. administers the House oath of office to Rep. Glenn Grothman, R-Wis., during a mock swearing in ceremony on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 3, 2017. CREDIT: AP Photo/Zach Gibson

On Monday, the Supreme Court announced that it would hear Gill v. Whitford, a Wisconsin-based case that is the most promising challenge to partisan gerrymandering to come up through the courts in over a decade.

Wisconsin Rep. Glenn Grothman (R) responded to the news by arguing there shouldn’t be any rules around how political parties draw district lines at all.

“I’m not sure there should be any restrictions whatsoever, because I don’t think it is the court’s business to draw lines,” Grothman told Matt Kittle of the conservative MacIver Institute in a Tuesday radio interview. “There are many rules right now — that the courts have laid out — that if you want your redistricting map approved you have to meet.”

You can listen to his remarks here, starting around 12:00:
...................

Partisan gerrymandering, by contrast — which is when a majority political party redraws the lines of the district maps to make it easier for them to win their next elections — is a murkier legal area: In a 1986 case, the Supreme Court held that partisan gerrymandering could be found unconstitutional, but didn’t specify how the courts could determine what was a constitutional redistricting and what was an unconstitutional gerrymander..........................

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Idiot Rep, Glenn Grothman, Teabagger, defends gerrymandering... (Original Post) riversedge Jun 2017 OP
I had hoped.... ewagner Jun 2017 #1
the 6th cd is such an odd shaped monster dembotoz Jun 2017 #2
The worst part about this news story... Archae Jul 2017 #3

ewagner

(18,967 posts)
1. I had hoped....
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 08:28 AM
Jun 2017

...that when Grothman was elected to Congress, he would become such a small fish in a large pond (er...ah...maybe smallest idiot in a pool of really big idiots?) that we would never hear from him again and he would serve a term or two and then cash out as a lobbyist.

no
such
luck

 

dembotoz

(16,922 posts)
2. the 6th cd is such an odd shaped monster
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 11:13 AM
Jun 2017

a giant H carved in the eastern half of the state

he is hard to remove

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Wisconsin»Idiot Rep, Glenn Grothman...