Wisconsin
Related: About this forumHigh court blocks union arguments....
A divided Wisconsin Supreme Court late Friday night blocked a group of unions from participating in oral arguments Monday that could determine the fate of Gov. Scott Walkers controversial anti-collective bargaining law.
In a 4-3 vote, the conservative-dominated court ruled that a group of unions that had convinced a Dane County Circuit Court judge to block statewide implementation of Act 10 has no standing to argue as the case goes to the high court Monday.
The majority found that the group of unions tried to intervene in the case too late. The plaintiffs in the case, Madison Teachers Inc. and the Milwaukee municipal union, Public Employees Local 61, AFL-CIO, will participate in the high-stakes arguments Monday. But the court ruled that the other unions request to make arguments before the court was untimely.
Intervention at this late stage will cause delay in the case that has been waiting for our review since June 14, 2013, according to the decision by justices Michael Gableman, David Prosser, Patience Roggensack and Annette Ziegler.
Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson and justices Ann Walsh Bradley and N. Patrick Crooks issued a strong dissent. They said blocking the other unions from participating is unfair and illogical.
http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/local/govt-and-politics/high-court-blocks-union-arguments/article_729252d4-3235-5e18-89c6-0f8f8a515bc4.html
charmay
(525 posts)ewagner
(18,964 posts)edited to add:
It occurs to me that there are different arguments against Act 10 that may be specific to different unions. I wonder if the courts read the briefs of the other unions and decided that the arguments presented would have been too strong to make a rational ruling against.
but then again.....
whoever accused these conservative justices of making rational rulings?
Blue Owl
(50,347 posts)Scott Walker, GO FUCK YOURSELF.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)If your goal is to crush unions.