Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Wisconsin ~ Son of Doe: Gunsmoke
http://cognidissidence.blogspot.com/2013/11/son-of-doe-gunsmoke.htmlBut at the bottom of this page is a note which apparently is supposed to be a sort of name-dropping reference regarding the work he did for the campaign of David "Chokehold" Prosser. Read it closely several times. It is simply jaw dropping in what he says:
In this one paragraph, along with the poor grammar, Behling is saying that he worked with the third party groups to help the Prosser campaign using "very creative" ways to get around campaign laws. He also laments hat it wasn't as easy as helping Walker's campaign because WISGOP wasn't there to help the campaign.
Again, just to drive the point home, that's an admission of collaboration between Prosser's campaign and the third party, dark money groups. It is also an admission of collaboration between Walker's campaign, the third party groups and WISGOP.
...
ADDENDUM: Since I know that some of you will be looking through the pdf before I can do further work on it, check out pages 51-53 and the emails between Steve Einhorn and Matejov. Einhorn is the guy who took Bradley Foundation money to put up the racist billboards aimed at voter suppression. He was also involved with a pay for play deal with Walker's administration as well.
In this one paragraph, along with the poor grammar, Behling is saying that he worked with the third party groups to help the Prosser campaign using "very creative" ways to get around campaign laws. He also laments hat it wasn't as easy as helping Walker's campaign because WISGOP wasn't there to help the campaign.
Again, just to drive the point home, that's an admission of collaboration between Prosser's campaign and the third party, dark money groups. It is also an admission of collaboration between Walker's campaign, the third party groups and WISGOP.
...
ADDENDUM: Since I know that some of you will be looking through the pdf before I can do further work on it, check out pages 51-53 and the emails between Steve Einhorn and Matejov. Einhorn is the guy who took Bradley Foundation money to put up the racist billboards aimed at voter suppression. He was also involved with a pay for play deal with Walker's administration as well.
So what are the odds that Prosser would recuse himself from this case?
