Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Soph0571

(9,685 posts)
Sun May 30, 2021, 04:45 AM May 2021

Boris Johnson says "I do", but in a very specific and limited way

Boris Johnson's wedding vows exclusively revealed

A Downing Street official told us, “It is perfectly normal for a high-profile couple to get engaged, telling everyone including the media they’re doing it, and to then get married in secret just days after some pretty damning negative press.

“I should also point out there is no truth in the rumour that Boris demanded a ‘quickie’ marriage after someone said he could declare all gifts and loans in the last couple of years as ‘early wedding gifts’.”

Meanwhile, we have gained exclusive access to Boris’ wedding vows, which he had drawn on a flash card next to a childish doodle of some boobs:

“I, Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson take thee, the third one, to be my current wife,
forsaking most others,
to have and to hold from this day forward until such time as it is no longer convenient,
for better, and only better,
for richer, and much richer,
in sickness (as long as it’s not one of the bad ones),
to love and to cherish, till something better comes along,
as long we both shall live comfortably.”

[link:https://newsthump.com/2021/05/30/boris-johnsons-wedding-vows-exclusively-revealed/|]

LOL.
The timing of this wedding could not look more dodgy!

The Daily Mash actually predicted this happening in a satire piece on the 27th...


[link:https://www.thedailymash.co.uk/politics/johnson-brings-forward-wedding-to-this-afternoon-20210527208533|]

You literally could not make this shit up.
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Boris Johnson says "I do", but in a very specific and limited way (Original Post) Soph0571 May 2021 OP
Isn't this a comedy, satire site? littlemissmartypants May 2021 #1
yes, but the wedding was real n/t Soph0571 May 2021 #2
Satirists are having a very hard time keeping up with the Tories' real-life shenanigans. n/t Emrys May 2021 #5
And the Mash follow-up: Johnson places advert for mistress in Times muriel_volestrangler May 2021 #3
LOL! Soph0571 May 2021 #4
OMG, that's funny! ShazzieB May 2021 #7
Tis love, surely ? Whaddya mean it distracts from his latest disaster. OnDoutside May 2021 #6
Hahaha Soph0571 May 2021 #12
In America Cosmo Blues May 2021 #8
The same sort of law of "marital privilege" or "spousal privilege" applies in the UK. Emrys May 2021 #9
In England, but not in Scotland muriel_volestrangler May 2021 #10
I certainly appreciate someone acknowledging the difference between English and Scots law Emrys May 2021 #11
Thank you both Cosmo Blues May 2021 #13

OnDoutside

(19,952 posts)
6. Tis love, surely ? Whaddya mean it distracts from his latest disaster.
Sun May 30, 2021, 07:39 AM
May 2021

Hitler married Eva Braun before the end too.

Emrys

(7,229 posts)
9. The same sort of law of "marital privilege" or "spousal privilege" applies in the UK.
Sun May 30, 2021, 11:45 AM
May 2021
https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/0-522-0935

Some have suggested this may have been an impetus behind this rushed marriage, but on past form, the real driver may be much more mundane or weirder. The most damaging behind-the-scenes communications between Johnson and his now wife may have already occurred so it might not apply, but who knows what's to come?

muriel_volestrangler

(101,295 posts)
10. In England, but not in Scotland
Sun May 30, 2021, 01:23 PM
May 2021
This absolute immunity lasted only until the entry into force of section 80 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, which restored in limited cases the ability of the prosecution to compel the testimony of the spouse of the accused (later amended to include civil partners), namely where the defendant has been charged with "assault on, or injury or a threat of injury to" the spouse or a child under 16, or a sexual offence toward a child under 16.[9] In addition, under the 1984 Act, the defence can almost always compel the spouse to testify,[9] and as set out in section 53 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 a spouse will generally be competent to offer testimony voluntarily.[11] However, a spouse (or civil partner) who is an active co-defendant to the charge can only testify for the defence (and cannot be compelled to do so by either side), part of her own right to the privilege against self-incrimination.
...
As of the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010 spouses and civil partners are compellable witnesses.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spousal_privilege#Testimonial_privilege_2

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2010/13/section/86

Emrys

(7,229 posts)
11. I certainly appreciate someone acknowledging the difference between English and Scots law
Sun May 30, 2021, 04:12 PM
May 2021

(which my Reuters link above didn't, and also skimped on the details yours provides).

Johnson will no doubt be tried and imprisoned for life (my fantasy) under English law, unless he flees across the border and all of a sudden recognizes Scotland's sovereignty and claims refugee status.

I'll bear the distinction in mind should my wife and I find that our past acts and omissions finally catch up with us.

As I said above, I suspect the impetus behind Johnson's sudden wedding will end up being more tawdry than even my fevered imagination can conjure.

Cosmo Blues

(2,480 posts)
13. Thank you both
Mon May 31, 2021, 09:22 AM
May 2021

As an unmarried Southern California I'm sure that is all the information about spousal privilege I'll need in England and Scotland

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»United Kingdom»Boris Johnson says "I do"...