Tue May 3, 2016, 07:06 PM
Kip Humphrey (4,753 posts)
The vote reporting appears to be irregular by being too regular, suggesting the running of anLast edited Tue May 3, 2016, 11:17 PM - Edit history (14)
algorithm
as the vote approaches 50%/50%, the vote reports out as (50% +.4%, 50% -.4%) (50% +.7%, 50% -.7%) (50% +.9%, 50% -.9%) Update: (50% +1.9%,50%-1.9%) (50% +1.8%,50%-1.8%) Update: (50% +1.9%,50%-1.9%) Update: (50% +2.1%,50%-2.1%) Update: (50% +2.2%,50%-2.2%) Update: (50% +2.3%,50%-2.3%) Update: (50% +2.4%,50%-2.4%) Update: (50% +2.5%,50%-2.5%) Update: (50% +2.7%,50%-2.7%) Update: (50% +2.8%,50%-2.8%) Update: (50% +2.9%,50%-2.9%) Update: (50% +3.0%,50%-3.0%) Update: anyone see a pattern here yet? a smoothing algorithm is running. (50% +3.1%,50%-3.1%) Update: (50% +3.2%,50%-3.2%) Update: (50% +3.3%,50%-3.3%) Update: (50% +3.2%,50%-3.2%) Update: (50% +3.3%,50%-3.3%) Update: (50% +2.9%,50%-2.9%) Update: (50% +3.1%,50%-3.1%) Update: (50% +2.7%,50%-2.7%) Update: (50% +2.4%,50%-2.4%) Update: (50% +2.4%,50%-2.4%) Update: (50% +2.5%,50%-2.5%)
|
5 replies, 1386 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Kip Humphrey | May 2016 | OP |
JimDandy | May 2016 | #1 | |
L. Coyote | May 2016 | #5 | |
MFM008 | May 2016 | #2 | |
sharp_stick | May 2016 | #3 | |
CoffeeCat | May 2016 | #4 |
Response to Kip Humphrey (Original post)
Tue May 3, 2016, 07:09 PM
JimDandy (7,318 posts)
1. For all us non statisticians, can you explain what this means in layman's terms? n/t
Response to JimDandy (Reply #1)
Sun May 15, 2016, 08:53 AM
L. Coyote (47,118 posts)
5. The vote total changes when more votes are counted.
It also means you don't know who wins until you finish counting the votes.
And, the one with the most votes wins. And, some people are conspiracy theorists. And, conspiracy theorist think every election is rigged. And, Republicans want you to think the election is rigged so you stay home all depressed, feeling powerless. In other words, in layman's terms, beware the bullshit you read online. |
Response to Kip Humphrey (Original post)
Tue May 3, 2016, 07:09 PM
MFM008 (18,926 posts)
2. so Sanders is winning
so its fraud? Election tampering?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to Kip Humphrey (Original post)
Tue May 3, 2016, 07:23 PM
sharp_stick (14,399 posts)
3. Oh Oh
I guess Sanders isn't performing as well as he needs to.
Gotta be fraud. |
Response to Kip Humphrey (Original post)
Tue May 3, 2016, 07:35 PM
CoffeeCat (24,411 posts)
4. We're stuck at 47%
and the Repubs are at 63%.
Let's get er done! |