Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 12:16 PM Sep 2013

For the BOG: Secretary John Kerry Syria FULL Statement, Unveils Evidence of Chemical Attack by Assad



Published on Aug 30, 2013

VIDEO DESCRIPTION:

News Conference Speech 8/30/2013


Kerry Says Assad, A 'Thug And Murderer,' Was Behind Attack
(WashingtonPost)

Secretary of State John F. Kerry made a forceful case Friday for U.S. military intervention in Syria, saying that U.S. intelligence has information pinning responsibility for last week's chemical weapons attack squarely on the government of President Bashar al-Assad.

In a speech at the State Department, Kerry said that for three days before the Aug. 21 attack, the Syrian regime's chemical weapons personnel "were in the area, making preparations" for the strike. He also said that "regime elements were told to prepare for the attack by putting on gas masks" and taking other precautions. And he said U.S. intelligence knows that the rockets containing the poison gas were launched only from "regime-controlled areas."

Two years after the first anti-government protests, conflict in Syria rages on. See the major events in the country's tumultuous uprising.

The attack killed more than 1,400 Syrians, including 426 children, Kerry said.

"The American people are tired of war," Kerry said, adding that he is also. "But fatigue does not absolve us of our responsibility." He said that "history would judge us all extraordinarily harshly" if the United States does not respond to the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian government.

Kerry spoke after French President Francois Hollande said Friday that his country is prepared to act in Syria despite Britain's surprise rejection of military action, potentially making a nation that turned its back on Washington during the war in Iraq the primary U.S. ally in a possible strike against Syrian forces.

President Obama is weighing military action against Syria as a way of sending a strong message of disapproval to Assad, whom U.S. officials say is culpable for the apparent Aug. 21 chemical weapons attacks that killed hundreds of men, women and children in rebel strongholds on the outskirts of Damascus.

A U.N. team of chemical weapons experts has been gathering evidence at the sites of the alleged strikes this week and will present its findings Saturday to U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon. The United States says it has clear proof that Assad's government was involved in the attacks.

Although U.S. officials have said repeatedly that they are trying to assemble an international coalition to support military action, the administration also insisted Thursday that, if necessary, Obama has both the authority and the will to act on his own.

"There are few countries that have the capacity to inflict a sanction by the appropriate means. France is one of them," Hollande said, according to the Reuters news agency. "We are ready. We will decide our position in close liaison with our allies."

German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle told the Neue Osnabrücker newspaper that Berlin's participation in a U.S.-led coalition has "neither been asked nor is it being considered by us."

The American public opposes broad military action in Syria, according to an NBC poll released Friday, but is more open to limited weapons strikes that could undermine Syria's chemical weapons capability. Still, an overwhelming majority of Americans want Obama to win the approval of Congress before authorizing such strikes, the poll found.


I had not seen this but have read discussions on the content and tenor of the interview. Here it is in full for you to review. I've only watched part of it and have to wrap my mind around the milieau in which this comes from.

I can see his reaasoning, and did like the parts with an 'IF' about military action and being mindful of NOT having another Iraq in Syria. That's never been the intent, but it's hard to know how things would end up.

ATTENTION: THIS IS A PROTECTED GROUP AND NOT A FORUM.

THE BOG IS A SAFE HAVEN FOR SUPPORTERS OF THE PRESIDENT, HIS PARTY, ADMNISTRATION AND POLICIES.

IT IS FOR MEMBERS OF THE BOG TO INCREASE OUR KNOWLEDGE OF CURRENT EVENTS.

PLEASE DO NOT POST IF YOU WANT TO BASH DEMOCRATS, KERRY, OBAMA OR THEIR SUPPORTERS.

IF YOU CANNOT RESPECT OBAMA, THE ADMINISTRATION, THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY OR THOSE WHO DO, PLEASE RESPECT THE SOP OF THIS GROUP OR CONSIDER NOT POSTING.

THOSE WHO POST HERE DISCUSS ISSUES WITHOUT VIOLATING THE INTENT OF THIS SAFE HAVEN GROUP.

THANK YOU.


7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
For the BOG: Secretary John Kerry Syria FULL Statement, Unveils Evidence of Chemical Attack by Assad (Original Post) freshwest Sep 2013 OP
Right now it is up to the Congress to get together and make their decision, I am so happy this has Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #1
Their politicking instead of doing their job has hurt us for years. If they have ideas that merit freshwest Sep 2013 #2
How sad the bolded text at the end is needed here . pkdu Sep 2013 #3
Thanks for Kerry's statement on Syria, Cha Sep 2013 #4
He's on live now in the Senate. nt DevonRex Sep 2013 #5
K&R. n/t FSogol Sep 2013 #6
... Cha Sep 2013 #7

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
1. Right now it is up to the Congress to get together and make their decision, I am so happy this has
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 12:22 PM
Sep 2013

been placed on them. They have not been willing to govern in the last few years so now is their time. I am very happy with Obama's decision to include the Congress, now they can put up or shut up. We are seeing post by the ODS group but then they complain about everything, keep their feet to the fire, President Obama.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
2. Their politicking instead of doing their job has hurt us for years. If they have ideas that merit
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 01:00 PM
Sep 2013
the support of Americans, now is their chance.

Put them forward in an open public debate and not in biased reports by media. Real time with the questions being asked that Americans need answered.

This is good. Obama is a transformative leader. He has consistently asked for the American people to give input, decide the direction we want our nation to go, and what we want it to be.

He respects the reality of diverse opinions and will work for what Americans decide. He believes that we can work together for our common good.

Whatever is best from those who oppose him and his policies, should be considered in light of what is best for all, not just a few. His job is to represent all of us, not just his supporters.

For this he is being called names but that denies the fact that half the country is not liberal. He can't represent just one side and force the other, that is not democracy.

All sides should get in the debate and we should get to a better way of going forward than in the past, respecting those who share common values that advance the interests of mankind.

Thanks for your comment.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Barack Obama»For the BOG: Secretary Jo...